IONQ vs. CGL.TO
IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) is a stock, while CGL.TO (iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged)) is Gold fund tracking the Gold Bullion. Over the past 5 years, IONQ returned 40.49%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for CGL.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IONQ vs. CGL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IONQ is traded in USD, while CGL.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CGL.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IONQ achieves a 28.93% return, which is significantly higher than CGL.TO's -5.12% return.
IONQ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 28.93%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 52.88%
- 3Y*
- 75.90%
- 5Y*
- 40.49%
- 10Y*
- —
CGL.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -11.35%
- YTD
- -5.12%
- 6M
- -4.61%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 25.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
IONQ vs. CGL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 28.93% | 7.42% | 237.13% | 259.13% | -79.34% | 50.11% |
CGL.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -5.12% | 67.73% | 15.88% | 13.97% | -6.96% | -4.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IONQ and CGL.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IONQ vs. CGL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
IONQ
CGL.TO
IONQ vs. CGL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IONQ | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.14 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 0.70 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 2.00 | -0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IONQ vs. CGL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IONQ drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than CGL.TO's maximum drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONQ and CGL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IONQ | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -62.05% | -27.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.61% | -27.17% | -40.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.61% | -27.17% | -40.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.00% | -27.17% | -62.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.53% | -24.91% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.88% | -32.74% | -18.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.20% | 9.43% | +27.77% |
Volatility
IONQ vs. CGL.TO - Volatility Comparison
IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a higher volatility of 31.60% compared to iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) at 7.69%. This indicates that IONQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IONQ | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.60% | 7.69% | +23.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.80% | 24.50% | +44.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.28% | 28.25% | +65.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.48% | 19.70% | +80.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.53% | 17.92% | +79.61% |
Dividends
IONQ vs. CGL.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither IONQ nor CGL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IONQ and CGL.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IONQ and CGL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer