IONL vs. PTIR
IONL (GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares - IONL tracks the IonQ Inc. (IONQ) while PTIR tracks the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IONL returned -67.92% vs -56.45% for PTIR. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IONL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PTIR.
Performance
IONL vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IONL having a -64.46% return and PTIR slightly higher at -62.18%.
IONL
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- -48.89%
- 6M
- -52.48%
- YTD
- -64.46%
- 1Y
- -67.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -40.83%
PTIR
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -11.63%
- 6M
- -43.20%
- YTD
- -62.18%
- 1Y
- -56.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 164.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.66M | $9.60M | $26.37M | |
| $34.43M | $50.90M | $65.92M |
IONL vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IONL GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF | -64.46% | 38.57% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -62.18% | 139.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between IONL and PTIR is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | 0.43 |
IONL vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IONL
PTIR
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IONL
PTIR
Basic Materials
IONL
-
PTIR
-
Communication Services
IONL
-
PTIR
-
Consumer Cyclical
IONL
-
PTIR
-
Consumer Defensive
IONL
-
PTIR
-
Energy
IONL
-
PTIR
-
Financial Services
IONL
-
PTIR
-
Healthcare
IONL
-
PTIR
-
Industrials
IONL
-
PTIR
-
Real Estate
IONL
-
PTIR
-
Utilities
IONL
-
PTIR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IONL vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
IONL
PTIR
IONL vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IONL | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.95 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.74 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | -1.21 | +0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IONL vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IONL drawdown since its inception was -93.48%, which is greater than PTIR's maximum drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONL and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IONL | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.48% | -79.40% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.48% | -79.40% | -14.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.68% | -73.93% | -17.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.97% | -31.05% | -22.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.08% | 48.56% | +21.52% |
Volatility
IONL vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) has a higher volatility of 45.76% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) at 27.36%. This indicates that IONL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IONL | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 45.76% | 27.36% | +18.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 136.52% | 81.50% | +55.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.52% | 104.45% | +84.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 193.89% | 127.66% | +66.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 193.89% | 127.66% | +66.23% |
IONL vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IONL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIR's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
IONL vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
IONL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IONL GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 15.36% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IONL and PTIR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IONL has higher volatility (45.76%) compared to PTIR (27.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONL dropped -93.48% vs PTIR's -79.40%.
On 1-year performance, PTIR leads with -56.45% vs -67.92% for IONL. On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, PTIR has been the lower-risk option at 27.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PTIR has performed better with a -56.45% return vs -67.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTIR is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for IONL.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 0.00% for IONL.
IONL tracks IonQ Inc. (IONQ), while PTIR tracks Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.50% for IONL and 1.04% for PTIR.
IONL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IONL and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer