PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IONL vs. NVDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IONL vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IONL achieves a 48.62% return, which is significantly higher than NVDG's 18.93% return.


IONL

1D
-8.47%
1M
99.80%
YTD
48.62%
6M
17.16%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDG

1D
-7.35%
1M
14.07%
YTD
18.93%
6M
26.05%
1Y
83.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IONL vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IONL and NVDG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IONL vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IONL
IONL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
IONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IONL vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IONLNVDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

1.96

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.18

4.44

-4.26

IONL vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IONL Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the NVDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IONL and NVDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IONLNVDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

1.24

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.40

+0.03

Drawdowns

IONL vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IONL drawdown since its inception was -93.41%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONL and NVDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IONLNVDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.41%

-66.19%

-27.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.41%

-42.72%

-50.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.21%

-18.34%

-46.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-23.07%

-27.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.00%

18.77%

+43.23%

Volatility

IONL vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) has a higher volatility of 59.44% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) at 25.14%. This indicates that IONL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IONLNVDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

59.44%

25.14%

+34.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

130.72%

50.15%

+80.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

181.66%

67.81%

+113.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

195.45%

90.72%

+104.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

195.45%

90.72%

+104.73%

IONL vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IONL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IONL vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

IONL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IONL and NVDG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IONL has higher volatility (59.44%) compared to NVDG (25.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONL dropped -93.41% vs NVDG's -66.19%.

On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 83.14% vs 11.24% for IONL. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NVDG has been the lower-risk option at 25.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 83.14% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for IONL.

NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 0.00% for IONL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for IONL and 0.75% for NVDG.

NVDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IONL and NVDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer