IONL vs. MUU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IONL (GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - IONL tracks the IonQ Inc. (IONQ) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IONL returned -76.53% vs 2599.25% for MUU. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IONL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

IONL vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IONL achieves a -65.55% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 449.17% return.

IONL

• 1D: -12.69%
• 1M: -63.28%
• 6M: -68.66%
• YTD: -65.55%
• 1Y: -76.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: -12.02%
• 1M: -37.86%
• 6M: 305.92%
• YTD: 449.17%
• 1Y: 2,599.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IONL vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IONL GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF	-65.55%	38.57%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	449.17%	495.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IONL and MUU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

IONL vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IONL

IONL Risk / Return Rank: 6
IONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
IONL Omega Ratio Rank: 10
IONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IONL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IONL vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IONL	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	17.30	-17.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.19	5.00	-4.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.63	-0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	47.69	-48.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.13	152.81	-153.94

IONL vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IONL Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 17.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IONL and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IONL vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IONL drawdown since its inception was -93.41%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONL and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	IONL	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.41%	-75.07%	-18.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-93.41%	-55.25%	-38.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.94%	-55.25%	-36.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.69%	-23.62%	-29.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	67.80%	17.31%	+50.49%

Volatility

IONL vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) is 41.90%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 62.52%. This indicates that IONL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IONL	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.90%	62.52%	-20.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	136.05%	125.23%	+10.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	186.51%	152.52%	+33.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	194.61%	142.32%	+52.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	194.61%	142.32%	+52.29%

IONL vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IONL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

IONL vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

IONL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IONL GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	1.24%	4.27%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IONL and MUU in my portfolio?

IONL and MUU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IONL or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (62.52%) compared to IONL (41.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONL dropped -93.41% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, IONL or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2599.25% vs -76.53% for IONL. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, IONL has been the lower-risk option at 41.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IONL or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2599.25% return vs -76.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IONL or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for IONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IONL or MUU?

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for IONL.

What is the main difference between IONL and MUU?

IONL tracks IonQ Inc. (IONQ), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for IONL and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.30 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.