IONL vs. DLLL
IONL (GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares - IONL tracks the IonQ Inc. (IONQ) while DLLL tracks the Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IONL returned -38.37% vs 753.45% for DLLL. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
IONL vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IONL achieves a -15.57% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 787.26% return.
IONL
- 1D
- -14.51%
- 1M
- -35.59%
- YTD
- -15.57%
- 6M
- -32.34%
- 1Y
- -38.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- 94.80%
- YTD
- 787.26%
- 6M
- 750.24%
- 1Y
- 753.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IONL vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IONL GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF | -15.57% | 38.57% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 787.26% | 22.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between IONL and DLLL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | 0.35 |
IONL vs. DLLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IONL
DLLL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IONL
DLLL
Basic Materials
IONL
-
DLLL
-
Communication Services
IONL
-
DLLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
IONL
-
DLLL
-
Consumer Defensive
IONL
-
DLLL
-
Energy
IONL
-
DLLL
-
Financial Services
IONL
-
DLLL
-
Healthcare
IONL
-
DLLL
-
Industrials
IONL
-
DLLL
-
Real Estate
IONL
-
DLLL
-
Utilities
IONL
-
DLLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IONL vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
IONL
DLLL
IONL vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IONL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.56 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 13.30 | -13.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 27.05 | -27.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IONL vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IONL drawdown since its inception was -93.41%, which is greater than DLLL's maximum drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONL and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IONL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.41% | -68.58% | -24.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.41% | -57.19% | -36.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.23% | -16.07% | -64.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.11% | -25.83% | -25.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 64.53% | 28.06% | +36.47% |
Volatility
IONL vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) is 56.95%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 61.95%. This indicates that IONL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IONL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 56.95% | 61.95% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 134.66% | 102.52% | +32.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 186.73% | 130.96% | +55.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 195.89% | 129.49% | +66.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 195.89% | 129.49% | +66.40% |
IONL vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IONL and DLLL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
IONL vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither IONL nor DLLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IONL and DLLL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (61.95%) compared to IONL (56.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONL dropped -93.41% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 753.45% vs -38.37% for IONL. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, IONL has been the lower-risk option at 56.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 753.45% return vs -38.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IONL and DLLL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
IONL and DLLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IONL tracks IonQ Inc. (IONQ), while DLLL tracks Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL).
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.81 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IONL and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer