ION vs. OIH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ION (Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF) and OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ION is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net, while OIH is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ION returned 8.05%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for OIH. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ION charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for OIH.

Performance

ION vs. OIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ION achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly lower than OIH's 34.46% return.

ION

• 1D: -3.05%
• 1M: -19.37%
• 6M: -21.38%
• YTD: -8.79%
• 1Y: 56.28%
• 3Y*: 8.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OIH

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -10.57%
• 6M: 22.20%
• YTD: 34.46%
• 1Y: 54.44%
• 3Y*: 7.93%
• 5Y*: 15.28%
• 10Y*: -2.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ION vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF	-8.79%	108.37%	-20.02%	-14.10%	-8.45%
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF	34.46%	6.81%	-10.53%	3.20%	0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ION and OIH is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between ION and OIH has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ION vs. OIH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ION	OIH
Basic Materials	13.9%	-
Financial Services	9.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	-
Energy	2.6%	100.0%
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Healthcare	1.9%	-
Industrials	1.8%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

ION vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ION

ION Risk / Return Rank: 47
ION Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ION Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ION Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ION Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
ION Martin Ratio Rank: 44

OIH

OIH Risk / Return Rank: 66
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 62
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ION vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ION	OIH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.82	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.44	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	2.63	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.71	9.28	-3.57

ION vs. OIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ION Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the OIH Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ION and OIH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ION vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ION drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, smaller than the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ION and OIH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ION	OIH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.08%	-94.45%	+42.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.20%	-20.78%	-10.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.77%	-43.80%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.80%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.20%	-65.90%	+34.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.64%	-48.90%	+25.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.88%	5.95%	+3.93%

Volatility

ION vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison

Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) at 8.81%. This indicates that ION's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ION	OIH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.21%	8.81%	+3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.31%	20.87%	+10.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.87%	30.14%	+9.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.60%	36.65%	-5.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.60%	42.31%	-10.71%

ION vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ION has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than OIH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ION vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison

ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than OIH's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF	1.63%	1.63%	1.74%	2.23%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF	1.27%	1.71%	2.01%	1.36%	0.95%	0.98%	1.23%	2.10%	2.13%	2.60%	1.40%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ION and OIH in my portfolio?

ION and OIH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ION or OIH?

ION has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to OIH (8.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ION dropped -52.08% vs OIH's -94.45%.

Which ETF is better, ION or OIH?

On 3-year performance, ION leads with 8.05% vs 7.93% for OIH. On fees, OIH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, OIH has been the lower-risk option at 8.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ION or OIH?

Over the 3-year period, ION has performed better with a 8.05% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ION or OIH?

OIH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for ION.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ION or OIH?

ION has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.27% for OIH.

What is the main difference between ION and OIH?

ION is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while OIH is Energy Equities. ION tracks S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net, while OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ION and 0.35% for OIH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.