PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ION vs. IVVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ION vs. IVVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and Invivyd Inc. (IVVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ION achieves a -12.05% return, which is significantly higher than IVVD's -72.26% return.


ION

1D
-2.66%
1M
-19.28%
6M
-23.00%
YTD
-12.05%
1Y
45.93%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.98%

IVVD

1D
-7.70%
1M
-29.34%
6M
-72.03%
YTD
-72.26%
1Y
-8.32%
3Y*
-22.28%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-49.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ION vs. IVVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ION
Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
-12.05%108.37%-20.02%-14.10%-8.45%
IVVD
Invivyd Inc.
-72.26%457.44%-88.75%162.67%-33.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ION and IVVD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ION vs. IVVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ION
ION Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ION Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ION Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ION Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ION Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ION Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IVVD
IVVD Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IVVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ION vs. IVVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and Invivyd Inc. (IVVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IONIVVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.12

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

-0.11

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

-0.21

+4.47

ION vs. IVVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ION Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the IVVD Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ION and IVVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ION vs. IVVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ION drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, smaller than the maximum IVVD drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ION and IVVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IONIVVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.08%

-99.36%

+47.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.66%

-76.20%

+42.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.11%

-92.90%

+47.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.66%

-98.78%

+65.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.68%

-91.23%

+67.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

39.32%

-28.51%

Volatility

ION vs. IVVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) is 9.58%, while Invivyd Inc. (IVVD) has a volatility of 26.34%. This indicates that ION experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IONIVVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.58%

26.34%

-16.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.29%

67.52%

-36.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.13%

141.88%

-101.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.64%

177.45%

-145.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.64%

177.45%

-145.81%

Dividends

ION vs. IVVD - Dividend Comparison

ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while IVVD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ION
Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
1.69%1.63%1.74%2.23%0.13%
IVVD
Invivyd Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ION and IVVD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVVD has higher volatility (26.34%) compared to ION (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ION dropped -52.08% vs IVVD's -99.36%.

ION currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ION and IVVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer