ION vs. EIPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ION (Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. ION is passively managed, while EIPX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ION returned 18.91%/yr vs 21.12%/yr for EIPX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ION charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EIPX.

Performance

ION vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ION achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly lower than EIPX's 21.96% return.

ION

• 1D: -3.20%
• 1M: -9.27%
• YTD: 14.02%
• 6M: 27.44%
• 1Y: 123.41%
• 3Y*: 18.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EIPX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 21.96%
• 6M: 19.46%
• 1Y: 30.04%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ION vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF	14.02%	108.37%	-20.02%	-14.10%	-8.86%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	21.96%	11.44%	19.11%	10.74%	-3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ION and EIPX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between ION and EIPX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ION vs. EIPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ION	EIPX
Basic Materials	14.5%	-
Financial Services	13.0%	-
Energy	2.4%	69.5%
Real Estate	2.4%	-
Healthcare	1.7%	-
Industrials	1.6%	4.2%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Technology	-	0.2%
Utilities	-	26.1%

Return for Risk

ION vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ION

ION Risk / Return Rank: 84
ION Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ION Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ION Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ION Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ION Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 86
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ION vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ION	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.27	2.71	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	3.82	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.46	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.33	7.32	-2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.79	20.31	-1.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ION vs. EIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ION Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is comparable to the EIPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ION and EIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ION	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.27	2.71	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	1.20	-0.81

Drawdowns

ION vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ION drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, which is greater than EIPX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ION and EIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ION	EIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.08%	-15.43%	-36.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.30%	-4.12%	-19.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.47%	-15.43%	-31.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.99%	-2.58%	-11.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.70%	-2.27%	-21.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.59%	1.49%	+5.10%

Volatility

ION vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison

Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) has a higher volatility of 12.06% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) at 4.01%. This indicates that ION's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ION	EIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.06%	4.01%	+8.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.90%	8.50%	+21.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.92%	11.17%	+26.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.08%	15.06%	+16.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.08%	15.06%	+16.02%

ION vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ION has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ION vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison

ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than EIPX's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.68%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF	1.40%	1.63%	1.74%	2.23%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ION and EIPX in my portfolio?

ION and EIPX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ION or EIPX?

ION has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to EIPX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ION dropped -52.08% vs EIPX's -15.43%.

Which ETF is better, ION or EIPX?

On 3-year performance, EIPX leads with 21.12% vs 18.91% for ION. On fees, ION is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ION or EIPX?

Over the 3-year period, EIPX has performed better with a 21.12% return vs 18.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ION or EIPX?

ION is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ION or EIPX?

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.40% for ION.

What is the main difference between ION and EIPX?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ION and 0.95% for EIPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ION currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.