PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOGP.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IOGP.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IOGP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IOGP.L is traded in USD, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOGP.L achieves a 28.57% return, which is significantly higher than IITU.L's 25.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IOGP.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 7.46%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 26.68% annualized return.


IOGP.L

1D
2.02%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
28.57%
6M
24.95%
1Y
36.79%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
16.29%
10Y*
7.46%

IITU.L

1D
-1.10%
1M
17.28%
YTD
25.57%
6M
25.31%
1Y
55.84%
3Y*
35.52%
5Y*
24.71%
10Y*
26.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOGP.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOGP.L
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
28.57%6.29%-0.90%2.72%37.88%67.23%-31.61%8.06%-21.55%-3.94%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
25.57%23.07%38.50%58.65%-29.11%34.44%42.58%49.99%-1.62%37.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IOGP.L and IITU.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015

0.27

The correlation between IOGP.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IOGP.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOGP.L
IOGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IOGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IOGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOGP.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IOGP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOGP.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.31

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.32

9.97

-3.66

IOGP.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOGP.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOGP.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.79

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.07

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

1.22

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

1.15

-1.08

Drawdowns

IOGP.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOGP.L drawdown since its inception was -83.56%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOGP.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IOGP.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.56%

-34.22%

-49.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-16.80%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-26.42%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.41%

-34.22%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.37%

-34.22%

-40.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.38%

-1.10%

-7.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.25%

-5.93%

-29.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

5.58%

+0.23%

Volatility

IOGP.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IOGP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) at 6.33%. This indicates that IOGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IOGP.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

6.33%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.52%

14.89%

+5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.66%

19.97%

+4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.34%

23.17%

+7.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.81%

21.84%

+10.97%

IOGP.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOGP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IOGP.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IOGP.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IOGP.L and IITU.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IOGP.L.

IOGP.L is categorized as Oil & Gas, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. IOGP.L tracks S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IOGP.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOGP.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer