IOGP.L vs. CNDX.L
IOGP.L (iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IOGP.L is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index, while CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IOGP.L returned 7.46%/yr vs 21.78%/yr for CNDX.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IOGP.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CNDX.L.
Performance
IOGP.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOGP.L achieves a 28.57% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.L's 20.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IOGP.L has underperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of 7.46%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.78% annualized return.
IOGP.L
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 28.57%
- 6M
- 24.95%
- 1Y
- 36.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.46%
CNDX.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 10.73%
- YTD
- 20.45%
- 6M
- 19.79%
- 1Y
- 41.85%
- 3Y*
- 28.56%
- 5Y*
- 17.77%
- 10Y*
- 21.78%
IOGP.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOGP.L iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.57% | 6.29% | -0.90% | 2.72% | 37.88% | 67.23% | -31.61% | 8.06% | -21.55% | -3.94% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 20.45% | 19.75% | 26.45% | 56.31% | -33.45% | 27.96% | 48.33% | 38.07% | -1.03% | 32.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOGP.L and CNDX.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2011 | 0.32 |
The correlation between IOGP.L and CNDX.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOGP.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank
IOGP.L
CNDX.L
IOGP.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IOGP.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IOGP.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.45 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 3.75 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 13.54 | -7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IOGP.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.62 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.85 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 1.08 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.12 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
IOGP.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOGP.L drawdown since its inception was -83.56%, which is greater than CNDX.L's maximum drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOGP.L and CNDX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOGP.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.56% | -35.17% | -48.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.44% | -11.00% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.14% | -22.44% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.41% | -35.17% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.37% | -35.17% | -39.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.38% | -0.10% | -8.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.25% | -5.30% | -29.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 3.07% | +2.74% |
Volatility
IOGP.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IOGP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) at 4.86%. This indicates that IOGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOGP.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 4.86% | +3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.52% | 11.86% | +8.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.66% | 15.82% | +8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.34% | 20.88% | +9.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.81% | 20.07% | +12.74% |
IOGP.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOGP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOGP.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IOGP.L nor CNDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
IOGP.L iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IOGP.L and CNDX.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNDX.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNDX.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IOGP.L.
IOGP.L is categorized as Oil & Gas, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. IOGP.L tracks S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index, while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IOGP.L and 0.33% for CNDX.L.
Find the right allocation for IOGP.L and CNDX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer