IOGP.L vs. CSP1.L
IOGP.L (iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IOGP.L is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IOGP.L returned 7.46%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for CSP1.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IOGP.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
IOGP.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IOGP.L is traded in USD, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOGP.L achieves a 28.57% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, IOGP.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 7.46%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.
IOGP.L
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 28.57%
- 6M
- 24.95%
- 1Y
- 36.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.46%
CSP1.L
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 10.92%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
IOGP.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOGP.L iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.57% | 6.29% | -0.90% | 2.72% | 37.88% | 67.23% | -31.61% | 8.06% | -21.55% | -3.94% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.23% | 17.63% | 25.22% | 26.11% | -18.77% | 29.88% | 17.14% | 31.49% | -5.65% | 21.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOGP.L and CSP1.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2011 | 0.42 |
The correlation between IOGP.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOGP.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
IOGP.L
CSP1.L
IOGP.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IOGP.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IOGP.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.45 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 3.23 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 13.95 | -7.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IOGP.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.51 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.88 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.95 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.00 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
IOGP.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOGP.L drawdown since its inception was -83.56%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOGP.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOGP.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.56% | -33.51% | -50.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.44% | -8.68% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.14% | -18.69% | -8.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.41% | -25.16% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.37% | -33.51% | -40.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.38% | -0.56% | -7.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.25% | -3.87% | -31.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 2.01% | +3.80% |
Volatility
IOGP.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IOGP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that IOGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOGP.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 2.49% | +5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.52% | 7.96% | +12.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.66% | 11.23% | +13.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.34% | 15.67% | +14.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.81% | 16.12% | +16.69% |
IOGP.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOGP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOGP.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IOGP.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IOGP.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IOGP.L.
IOGP.L is categorized as Oil & Gas, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. IOGP.L tracks S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IOGP.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for IOGP.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer