PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOCT vs. SFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IOCT vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IOCT vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IOCT
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October
0.55%18.96%4.88%17.54%5.13%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
-3.85%13.29%19.99%21.20%1.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOCT achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's -3.85% return.


IOCT

1D
1.79%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
0.55%
6M
2.58%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
10Y*

SFLR

1D
1.67%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IOCT vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IOCT vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOCT
IOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOCT vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOCTSFLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

1.23

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

1.71

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.99

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.65

7.91

+0.74

IOCT vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOCT and SFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOCTSFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.23

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.47

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between IOCT and SFLR is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IOCT vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

IOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


TTM2025202420232022
IOCT
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.35%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%

Drawdowns

IOCT vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOCT and SFLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IOCTSFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.94%

-12.13%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-6.79%

+0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-5.24%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-1.76%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.71%

-0.10%

Volatility

IOCT vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) at 3.72%. This indicates that IOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IOCTSFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

3.72%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.00%

7.42%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

10.83%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.38%

10.30%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.38%

10.30%

-0.92%