IOCT vs. PHEQ
IOCT (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October) and PHEQ (Parametric Hedged Equity ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IOCT returned 13.28% vs 15.97% for PHEQ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PHEQ.
Performance
IOCT vs. PHEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOCT achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than PHEQ's 5.67% return.
IOCT
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 13.28%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHEQ
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.67%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IOCT vs. PHEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IOCT Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October | 5.12% | 18.96% | 4.88% | 8.38% |
PHEQ Parametric Hedged Equity ETF | 5.67% | 11.76% | 14.94% | 7.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOCT and PHEQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.54 |
The correlation between IOCT and PHEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IOCT vs. PHEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IOCT
PHEQ
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IOCT
PHEQ
Industrials
IOCT
PHEQ
Healthcare
IOCT
PHEQ
Technology
IOCT
PHEQ
Consumer Cyclical
IOCT
PHEQ
Consumer Defensive
IOCT
PHEQ
Basic Materials
IOCT
PHEQ
Communication Services
IOCT
PHEQ
Energy
IOCT
PHEQ
Utilities
IOCT
PHEQ
Real Estate
IOCT
PHEQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOCT vs. PHEQ — Risk / Return Rank
IOCT
PHEQ
IOCT vs. PHEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) and Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IOCT | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 2.62 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 3.92 | -1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.52 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.77 | -1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 17.21 | -8.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IOCT | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.62 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.80 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
IOCT vs. PHEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, which is greater than PHEQ's maximum drawdown of -12.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOCT and PHEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOCT | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -12.55% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.84% | -4.26% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.18% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -0.97% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 0.93% | +0.61% |
Volatility
IOCT vs. PHEQ - Volatility Comparison
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) has a higher volatility of 2.15% compared to Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ) at 1.05%. This indicates that IOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOCT | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.15% | 1.05% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.44% | 4.56% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 6.16% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.36% | 8.62% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.36% | 8.62% | +0.74% |
IOCT vs. PHEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PHEQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOCT vs. PHEQ - Dividend Comparison
IOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IOCT Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHEQ Parametric Hedged Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IOCT and PHEQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IOCT has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to PHEQ (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOCT dropped -16.94% vs PHEQ's -12.55%.
On 1-year performance, PHEQ leads with 15.97% vs 13.28% for IOCT. On fees, PHEQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PHEQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PHEQ has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 13.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PHEQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IOCT.
PHEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for IOCT.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IOCT and 0.29% for PHEQ.
PHEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IOCT and PHEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer