IOCT vs. JULQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IOCT (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October) and JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. IOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JULQ.

Performance

IOCT vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IOCT

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 5.12%
• 6M: 6.59%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 12.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOCT vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IOCT Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October	1.74%
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%

IOCT vs. JULQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IOCT	JULQ
Financial Services	24.7%	14.0%
Industrials	19.8%	7.7%
Healthcare	10.6%	10.9%
Technology	10.3%	31.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	10.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	6.2%
Basic Materials	5.9%	1.8%
Communication Services	4.5%	9.5%
Energy	4.0%	3.2%
Utilities	4.0%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.3%

Return for Risk

IOCT vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOCT

IOCT Risk / Return Rank: 46
IOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
IOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
IOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
IOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOCT vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IOCT	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.63	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IOCT	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	—	—

Drawdowns

IOCT vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOCT and JULQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IOCT	JULQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.94%	0.00%	-16.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	0.00%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	0.00%	-2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IOCT	JULQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.83%	0.00%	+8.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.36%	0.00%	+9.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.36%	0.00%	+9.36%

IOCT vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

IOCT vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither IOCT nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IOCT or JULQ?

On fees, JULQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IOCT or JULQ?

JULQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IOCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IOCT or JULQ?

IOCT and JULQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IOCT and JULQ?

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IOCT and 0.79% for JULQ.