IOBZX vs. ICMUX
Compare and contrast key facts about ICON FlexibleBondFund (IOBZX) and Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX).
IOBZX is managed by ICON Funds. It was launched on May 5, 2004. ICMUX is managed by Intrepid Funds. It was launched on Jul 1, 2007.
Performance
IOBZX vs. ICMUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IOBZX vs. ICMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOBZX ICON FlexibleBondFund | -0.93% | 5.67% | 8.33% | 8.28% | -5.63% | 4.17% | 4.61% | 8.16% | 0.87% | 4.25% |
ICMUX Intrepid Income Fund | -0.24% | 8.16% | 10.43% | 10.90% | -3.17% | 10.02% | 8.77% | 4.65% | 0.53% | 3.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOBZX achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than ICMUX's -0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, IOBZX has underperformed ICMUX with an annualized return of 4.09%, while ICMUX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.93% annualized return.
IOBZX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 4.09%
ICMUX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 6.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IOBZX vs. ICMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOBZX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than ICMUX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IOBZX vs. ICMUX — Risk / Return Rank
IOBZX
ICMUX
IOBZX vs. ICMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON FlexibleBondFund (IOBZX) and Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IOBZX | ICMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 2.52 | -1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 3.40 | -1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.62 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 2.60 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 10.35 | -5.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IOBZX | ICMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 2.52 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | 2.35 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 2.30 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 2.04 | -0.95 |
Correlation
The correlation between IOBZX and ICMUX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IOBZX vs. ICMUX - Dividend Comparison
IOBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than ICMUX's 7.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOBZX ICON FlexibleBondFund | 5.79% | 6.74% | 6.71% | 5.65% | 5.22% | 4.90% | 4.03% | 4.67% | 4.18% | 4.07% | 3.58% | 4.00% |
ICMUX Intrepid Income Fund | 7.03% | 7.96% | 7.85% | 9.10% | 8.17% | 5.99% | 5.56% | 3.35% | 3.07% | 2.86% | 3.01% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
IOBZX vs. ICMUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOBZX drawdown since its inception was -15.53%, which is greater than ICMUX's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOBZX and ICMUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOBZX | ICMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.53% | -8.77% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.65% | -2.46% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.48% | -5.64% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.53% | -8.77% | -6.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -1.12% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -0.74% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 0.62% | +0.03% |
Volatility
IOBZX vs. ICMUX - Volatility Comparison
ICON FlexibleBondFund (IOBZX) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX) at 0.77%. This indicates that IOBZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IOBZX | ICMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 0.77% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.45% | 1.38% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47% | 2.59% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.80% | 2.66% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.74% | 2.58% | +1.16% |