PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOBZX vs. ICFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IOBZX vs. ICFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICON FlexibleBondFund (IOBZX) and ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOBZX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than ICFSX's -6.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IOBZX has underperformed ICFSX with an annualized return of 4.12%, while ICFSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.


IOBZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.67%
1Y
5.50%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
4.12%

ICFSX

1D
-0.91%
1M
-4.20%
YTD
-6.17%
6M
-2.91%
1Y
1.09%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOBZX vs. ICFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOBZX
ICON FlexibleBondFund
1.24%5.67%8.33%8.28%-5.63%4.17%4.61%8.16%0.87%4.25%
ICFSX
ICON Consumer Select Fund
-6.17%5.96%35.19%18.16%-10.30%22.79%-7.47%36.93%-18.04%20.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IOBZX and ICFSX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2004

0.01

Over the past year, IOBZX and ICFSX have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IOBZX vs. ICFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOBZX
IOBZX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IOBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IOBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ICFSX
ICFSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ICFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ICFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOBZX vs. ICFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON FlexibleBondFund (IOBZX) and ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOBZXICFSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.77

0.08

+2.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.93

0.21

+3.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.02

+0.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

0.10

+2.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.11

0.29

+11.83

IOBZX vs. ICFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOBZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the ICFSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOBZX and ICFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOBZXICFSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

0.08

+2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.33

0.39

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

0.42

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.19

+0.93

Drawdowns

IOBZX vs. ICFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOBZX drawdown since its inception was -15.53%, smaller than the maximum ICFSX drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOBZX and ICFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IOBZXICFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.53%

-77.40%

+61.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.08%

-12.67%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.97%

-20.61%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.48%

-23.27%

+14.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.53%

-48.50%

+32.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.21%

+9.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-21.36%

+20.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

4.55%

-4.09%

Volatility

IOBZX vs. ICFSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICON FlexibleBondFund (IOBZX) is 0.65%, while ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that IOBZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IOBZXICFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

3.77%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

10.49%

-8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00%

14.19%

-12.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.82%

20.44%

-17.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

23.77%

-20.07%

IOBZX vs. ICFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOBZX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than ICFSX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IOBZX vs. ICFSX - Dividend Comparison

IOBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, less than ICFSX's 11.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICFSX
ICON Consumer Select Fund
11.99%11.25%34.59%7.32%17.71%10.98%0.00%1.94%0.75%0.21%0.97%0.59%
IOBZX
ICON FlexibleBondFund
6.12%6.74%6.71%5.65%5.22%4.90%4.03%4.67%4.18%4.07%3.58%4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IOBZX and ICFSX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICFSX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to IOBZX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOBZX dropped -15.53% vs ICFSX's -77.40%.

IOBZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOBZX and ICFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer