INVN vs. ETHO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

INVN (Alger Russell Innovation ETF) and ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - INVN tracks the Alger Russell Innovation Index while ETHO tracks the Etho Climate Leadership Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, INVN returned 18.37% vs 34.18% for ETHO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INVN charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ETHO.

Performance

INVN vs. ETHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVN achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than ETHO's 21.47% return.

INVN

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 11.94%
• 6M: 10.19%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 1Y: 18.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETHO

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 3.93%
• 6M: 15.83%
• YTD: 21.47%
• 1Y: 34.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVN vs. ETHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INVN Alger Russell Innovation ETF	6.48%	6.56%
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	21.47%	8.57%

Correlation

The correlation between INVN and ETHO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025	0.69

The correlation between INVN and ETHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

INVN vs. ETHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVN

INVN Risk / Return Rank: 27
INVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
INVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
INVN Omega Ratio Rank: 28
INVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
INVN Martin Ratio Rank: 24

ETHO

ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 80
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVN vs. ETHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INVN	ETHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	1.94	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	2.76	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.33	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	3.71	-2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.28	14.37	-12.09

INVN vs. ETHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the ETHO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVN and ETHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INVN vs. ETHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVN drawdown since its inception was -26.01%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHO drawdown of -25.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVN and ETHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	INVN	ETHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.01%	-25.50%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.39%	-9.25%	-11.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-1.61%	+1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.50%	-4.33%	-3.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.07%	2.38%	+5.69%

Volatility

INVN vs. ETHO - Volatility Comparison

Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) at 4.42%. This indicates that INVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INVN	ETHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.07%	4.42%	+2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.72%	13.28%	+5.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.30%	17.72%	+4.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.84%	19.34%	+4.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.84%	19.34%	+4.50%

INVN vs. ETHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

INVN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHO's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

INVN vs. ETHO - Dividend Comparison

INVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than ETHO's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	0.70%	0.86%	0.69%
INVN Alger Russell Innovation ETF	0.27%	0.29%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INVN and ETHO in my portfolio?

INVN and ETHO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INVN or ETHO?

INVN has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to ETHO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVN dropped -26.01% vs ETHO's -25.50%.

Which ETF is better, INVN or ETHO?

On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 34.18% vs 18.37% for INVN. On fees, ETHO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INVN or ETHO?

Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 34.18% return vs 18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INVN or ETHO?

ETHO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for INVN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INVN or ETHO?

ETHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.27% for INVN.

What is the main difference between INVN and ETHO?

INVN tracks Alger Russell Innovation Index, while ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index. They also come from different issuers: Alger and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for INVN and 0.45% for ETHO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.