INVG vs. CMDT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INVG (GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - INVG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by GMO, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. INVG is actively managed, while CMDT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. INVG charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.

Performance

INVG vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVG achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 23.96% return.

INVG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMDT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 23.96%
• 6M: 24.09%
• 1Y: 35.85%
• 3Y*: 16.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVG vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF	0.68%	4.69%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	23.96%	9.42%

Correlation

The correlation between INVG and CMDT is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.26

Return for Risk

INVG vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 88
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVG vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INVG	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	1.32	-0.09

Drawdowns

INVG vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVG drawdown since its inception was -3.15%, smaller than the maximum CMDT drawdown of -9.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVG and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INVG	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.15%	-9.69%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.49%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-2.86%	+1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-2.69%	+1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INVG	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.42%	12.35%	-7.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.42%	12.21%	-7.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.42%	12.21%	-7.79%

INVG vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

INVG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

INVG vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

INVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than CMDT's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.44%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF	4.68%	2.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INVG and CMDT in my portfolio?

INVG and CMDT have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INVG or CMDT?

On fees, INVG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INVG or CMDT?

INVG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INVG or CMDT?

INVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.68%, compared with 2.44% for CMDT.

What is the main difference between INVG and CMDT?

INVG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CMDT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GMO and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for INVG and 0.65% for CMDT.