INTW vs. TSDD
INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INTW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INTW returned 1617.48% vs -62.89% for TSDD. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
INTW vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTW achieves a 562.71% return, which is significantly higher than TSDD's -4.27% return.
INTW
- 1D
- 8.89%
- 1M
- 29.41%
- YTD
- 562.71%
- 6M
- 361.23%
- 1Y
- 1,617.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -7.92%
- 1Y
- -62.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 562.71% | 50.41% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -4.27% | -78.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTW and TSDD is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | -0.27 |
INTW vs. TSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INTW
TSDD
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
INTW
TSDD
-
Basic Materials
INTW
-
TSDD
-
Communication Services
INTW
-
TSDD
-
Consumer Cyclical
INTW
-
TSDD
Consumer Defensive
INTW
-
TSDD
-
Energy
INTW
-
TSDD
-
Financial Services
INTW
-
TSDD
-
Healthcare
INTW
-
TSDD
-
Industrials
INTW
-
TSDD
-
Real Estate
INTW
-
TSDD
-
Utilities
INTW
-
TSDD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTW vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
INTW
TSDD
INTW vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INTW | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +12.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 0.90 | +0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 33.18 | -0.83 | +34.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 77.63 | -1.05 | +78.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTW | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42 | -0.68 | +12.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.39 | -0.66 | +4.05 |
Drawdowns
INTW vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTW drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTW and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTW | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.58% | -99.03% | +38.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.34% | -76.12% | +26.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.69% | -98.90% | +72.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.07% | -71.21% | +41.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.05% | 59.88% | -38.83% |
Volatility
INTW vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a higher volatility of 48.71% compared to GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) at 24.19%. This indicates that INTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTW | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.71% | 24.19% | +24.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 111.40% | 54.90% | +56.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 143.36% | 92.57% | +50.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.22% | 114.46% | +30.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.22% | 114.46% | +30.76% |
INTW vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both INTW and TSDD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
INTW vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.80% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTW and TSDD have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTW has higher volatility (48.71%) compared to TSDD (24.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTW dropped -60.58% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1617.48% vs -62.89% for TSDD. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, TSDD has been the lower-risk option at 24.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1617.48% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INTW and TSDD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.
INTW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSDD is Inverse Equities.
INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.42 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTW and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer