INTW vs. OKTG
INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) and OKTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTW charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OKTG.
Performance
INTW vs. OKTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTW achieves a 332.72% return, which is significantly higher than OKTG's 110.88% return.
INTW
- 1D
- -11.89%
- 1M
- -36.23%
- 6M
- 160.20%
- YTD
- 332.72%
- 1Y
- 833.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OKTG
- 1D
- -4.61%
- 1M
- 54.71%
- 6M
- 88.98%
- YTD
- 110.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW vs. OKTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 332.72% | 3.35% |
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 110.88% | 5.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTW and OKTG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTW vs. OKTG — Risk / Return Rank
INTW
OKTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW vs. OKTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTW | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTW vs. OKTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTW drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, roughly equal to the maximum OKTG drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTW and OKTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTW | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.58% | -60.69% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.46% | -9.20% | -46.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.73% | -22.77% | -6.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.21% | — | — |
Volatility
INTW vs. OKTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTW | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 52.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 123.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 154.09% | 133.12% | +20.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.56% | 133.12% | +16.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.56% | 133.12% | +16.44% |
INTW vs. OKTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTW has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OKTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTW vs. OKTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither INTW nor OKTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTW and OKTG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OKTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OKTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
INTW and OKTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for INTW and 0.75% for OKTG.
Find the right allocation for INTW and OKTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer