INTW vs. NTSD
INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTW charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
INTW vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INTW
- 1D
- 8.89%
- 1M
- 29.41%
- YTD
- 562.71%
- 6M
- 361.23%
- 1Y
- 1,617.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 394.57% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 17.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTW and NTSD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTW vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
INTW
NTSD
INTW vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INTW | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 33.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 77.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTW | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.39 | 5.08 | -1.69 |
Drawdowns
INTW vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTW drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTW and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTW | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.58% | -5.20% | -55.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.69% | -1.11% | -25.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.07% | -0.84% | -29.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.05% | — | — |
Volatility
INTW vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTW | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 111.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 143.36% | 24.28% | +119.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.22% | 24.28% | +120.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.22% | 24.28% | +120.94% |
INTW vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTW has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTW vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither INTW nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTW and NTSD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
INTW and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for INTW and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for INTW and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer