INTW vs. GEMG
INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) and GEMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GEMI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTW charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GEMG.
Performance
INTW vs. GEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTW achieves a 750.22% return, which is significantly higher than GEMG's -89.02% return.
INTW
- 1D
- -12.49%
- 1M
- 12.21%
- YTD
- 750.22%
- 6M
- 775.58%
- 1Y
- 1,964.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEMG
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -33.52%
- YTD
- -89.02%
- 6M
- -91.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW vs. GEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 750.22% | -6.11% |
GEMG Leverage Shares 2X Long GEMI Daily ETF | -89.02% | -71.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTW and GEMG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTW vs. GEMG — Risk / Return Rank
INTW
GEMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW vs. GEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEMI Daily ETF (GEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTW | GEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 40.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 91.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTW vs. GEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTW drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, smaller than the maximum GEMG drawdown of -97.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTW and GEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTW | GEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.58% | -97.26% | +36.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.49% | -97.10% | +84.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.66% | -81.17% | +51.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.70% | — | — |
Volatility
INTW vs. GEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTW | GEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 119.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.14% | 219.33% | -69.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.88% | 219.33% | -70.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.88% | 219.33% | -70.45% |
INTW vs. GEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTW has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTW vs. GEMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither INTW nor GEMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTW and GEMG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
INTW and GEMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for INTW and 0.75% for GEMG.
Find the right allocation for INTW and GEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer