PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTU vs. GD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INTU vs. GD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuit Inc. (INTU) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTU achieves a -53.65% return, which is significantly lower than GD's 2.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INTU having a 11.98% annualized return and GD not far behind at 11.59%.


INTU

1D
2.95%
1M
-22.91%
YTD
-53.65%
6M
-53.22%
1Y
-60.08%
3Y*
-10.25%
5Y*
-7.58%
10Y*
11.98%

GD

1D
-1.61%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
2.13%
6M
2.33%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTU vs. GD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTU
Intuit Inc.
-53.65%6.09%1.16%61.76%-39.12%70.27%46.12%34.11%25.86%39.21%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
2.13%30.39%3.52%7.13%21.69%43.77%-13.14%14.80%-21.34%19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between INTU and GD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 1993

0.27

The correlation between INTU and GD shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INTU:

$84.32B

GD:

$93.43B

EPS

INTU:

$16.37

GD:

$15.92

PE Ratio

INTU:

18.66

GD:

21.41

PEG Ratio

INTU:

1.12

GD:

2.71

PS Ratio

INTU:

4.09

GD:

1.73

PB Ratio

INTU:

4.09

GD:

3.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

INTU:

$20.93B

GD:

$53.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INTU:

$16.97B

GD:

$7.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

INTU:

$6.65B

GD:

$6.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTU vs. GD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTU
INTU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
INTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

GD
GD Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTU vs. GD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuit Inc. (INTU) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTUGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

1.24

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

1.77

-2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.83

6.11

-7.94

INTU vs. GD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTU Sharpe Ratio is -1.37, which is lower than the GD Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTU and GD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTUGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.37

1.22

-2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.72

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.51

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.57

-0.21

Drawdowns

INTU vs. GD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTU drawdown since its inception was -75.29%, roughly equal to the maximum GD drawdown of -75.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTU and GD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTUGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.29%

-75.67%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.00%

-14.53%

-48.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.00%

-22.55%

-40.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.00%

-22.55%

-40.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.00%

-51.63%

-11.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.90%

-6.79%

-55.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-15.61%

-8.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.93%

4.19%

+28.74%

Volatility

INTU vs. GD - Volatility Comparison

Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a higher volatility of 28.43% compared to General Dynamics Corporation (GD) at 5.72%. This indicates that INTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTUGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.43%

5.72%

+22.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.39%

17.14%

+25.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.21%

21.02%

+23.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.47%

20.40%

+17.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.95%

22.71%

+11.24%

Dividends

INTU vs. GD - Dividend Comparison

INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than GD's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
1.79%1.76%2.12%2.01%2.00%2.24%2.90%2.26%2.31%1.61%1.72%1.96%
INTU
Intuit Inc.
1.52%0.65%0.60%0.52%0.72%0.38%0.57%0.74%0.83%0.89%1.08%1.09%

Financials

INTU vs. GD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuit Inc. and General Dynamics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
8.56B
13.48B
(INTU) Total Revenue
(GD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INTU vs. GD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intuit Inc. and General Dynamics Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
84.6%
10.5%
Portfolio components
INTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.24B and revenue of 8.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

GD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.

INTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.

GD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

INTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a net income of 3.06B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in a net margin of 35.8%.

GD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INTU and GD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTU has higher volatility (28.43%) compared to GD (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTU dropped -75.29% vs GD's -75.67%.

GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTU and GD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer