INTU vs. CHPS
INTU (Intuit Inc.) is a stock, while CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Over the past 3 years, INTU returned -14.96%/yr vs 49.66%/yr for CHPS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INTU vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTU achieves a -55.08% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 78.69% return.
INTU
- 1D
- 5.40%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- 6M
- -46.44%
- YTD
- -55.08%
- 1Y
- -60.29%
- 3Y*
- -14.96%
- 5Y*
- -9.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
CHPS
- 1D
- -5.25%
- 1M
- -12.71%
- 6M
- 57.64%
- YTD
- 78.69%
- 1Y
- 137.41%
- 3Y*
- 49.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTU vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INTU Intuit Inc. | -55.08% | 6.09% | 1.16% | 31.31% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 78.69% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTU and CHPS is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.24 |
The correlation between INTU and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTU vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
INTU
CHPS
INTU vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuit Inc. (INTU) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTU | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.45 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 6.42 | -7.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 23.71 | -25.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTU vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTU drawdown since its inception was -75.29%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTU and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTU | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.29% | -39.44% | -35.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.19% | -21.52% | -46.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.19% | -39.44% | -28.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.08% | -21.52% | -41.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.25% | -9.15% | -15.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.12% | 5.82% | +33.30% |
Volatility
INTU vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Intuit Inc. (INTU) is 13.36%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 21.77%. This indicates that INTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTU | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.36% | 21.77% | -8.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.84% | 38.10% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.13% | 43.24% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.01% | 36.55% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.18% | 36.55% | -2.37% |
Dividends
INTU vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than CHPS's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.36% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INTU Intuit Inc. | 1.63% | 0.65% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.72% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.74% | 0.83% | 0.89% | 1.08% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTU and CHPS have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (21.77%) compared to INTU (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTU dropped -75.29% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTU and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer