INTM vs. IBMM
INTM (Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. INTM is actively managed, while IBMM is passively managed. INTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMM.
Performance
INTM vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INTM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTM vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF | 0.63% |
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTM vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTM | IBMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.05 | — | — |
Drawdowns
INTM vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTM drawdown since its inception was -2.65%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTM and IBMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTM | IBMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | 0.00% | -2.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | 0.00% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | 0.00% | -0.48% |
Volatility
INTM vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTM | IBMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53% | 0.00% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 0.00% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 0.00% | +2.53% |
INTM vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTM vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison
INTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF | 2.62% | 1.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for INTM.
INTM has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for INTM and 0.18% for IBMM.
Find the right allocation for INTM and IBMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer