INTM vs. BSMQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

INTM (Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF) and BSMQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Invesco. INTM is actively managed, while BSMQ is passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMQ.

Performance

INTM vs. BSMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTM achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than BSMQ's 0.81% return.

INTM

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 2.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSMQ

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 2.98%
• 3Y*: 2.90%
• 5Y*: 0.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTM vs. BSMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF	1.82%	4.72%
BSMQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF	0.81%	1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between INTM and BSMQ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.07

Return for Risk

INTM vs. BSMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMQ

BSMQ Risk / Return Rank: 84
BSMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BSMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BSMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BSMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BSMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTM vs. BSMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INTM	BSMQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.05	0.25	+2.80

Drawdowns

INTM vs. BSMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTM drawdown since its inception was -2.65%, smaller than the maximum BSMQ drawdown of -13.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTM and BSMQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	INTM	BSMQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-13.18%	+10.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.33%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-0.05%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.48%	-3.47%	+2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INTM	BSMQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53%	1.33%	+1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.53%	2.68%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.53%	4.79%	-2.26%

INTM vs. BSMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

INTM vs. BSMQ - Dividend Comparison

INTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than BSMQ's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSMQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF	2.76%	2.74%	2.75%	2.47%	1.60%	1.14%	1.57%	0.44%
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF	2.62%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INTM and BSMQ in my portfolio?

INTM and BSMQ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INTM or BSMQ?

On fees, BSMQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INTM or BSMQ?

BSMQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for INTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INTM or BSMQ?

BSMQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.62% for INTM.

What is the main difference between INTM and BSMQ?

Their fees differ too: 0.35% for INTM and 0.18% for BSMQ.