PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTL.L vs. GXLK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTL.L vs. GXLK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

INTL.L is traded in GBp, while GXLK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTL.L achieves a 50.10% return, which is significantly higher than GXLK.L's 25.97% return.


INTL.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
25.51%
YTD
50.10%
6M
51.64%
1Y
96.68%
3Y*
31.07%
5Y*
17.40%
10Y*

GXLK.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
18.41%
YTD
25.97%
6M
25.10%
1Y
57.36%
3Y*
27.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTL.L vs. GXLK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc
50.10%14.50%13.58%48.71%-27.73%
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
25.97%15.88%24.73%48.31%-16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between INTL.L and GXLK.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.82

The correlation between INTL.L and GXLK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTL.L vs. GXLK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLK.L
GXLK.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTL.L vs. GXLK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTL.LGXLK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.49

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.37

3.42

+2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.68

8.75

+10.93

INTL.L vs. GXLK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is comparable to the GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTL.L and GXLK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTL.LGXLK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85

2.97

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.81

+0.14

Drawdowns

INTL.L vs. GXLK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTL.L drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, which is greater than GXLK.L's maximum drawdown of -28.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL.L and GXLK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTL.LGXLK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.71%

-28.24%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-16.67%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.54%

-28.24%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.72%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.00%

-7.64%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

6.54%

-1.64%

Volatility

INTL.L vs. GXLK.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) at 6.33%. This indicates that INTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXLK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTL.LGXLK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.73%

6.33%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.45%

13.91%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.03%

19.29%

+5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.61%

26.82%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.29%

26.82%

-0.53%

INTL.L vs. GXLK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLK.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTL.L vs. GXLK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTL.L nor GXLK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


INTL.L and GXLK.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLK.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLK.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INTL.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for INTL.L and 0.15% for GXLK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTL.L and GXLK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer