PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
INTL.L vs. ECAR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INTL.L (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and ECAR.L (iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from WisdomTree and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INTL.L returned 17.40%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for ECAR.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.

Performance

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

INTL.L is traded in GBp, while ECAR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ECAR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTL.L achieves a 50.10% return, which is significantly lower than ECAR.L's 61.55% return.

INTL.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
25.51%
YTD
50.10%
6M
51.64%
1Y
96.68%
3Y*
31.07%
5Y*
17.40%
10Y*
—

ECAR.L

1D
0.61%
1M
24.63%
YTD
61.55%
6M
63.54%
1Y
99.07%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc		50.10%14.50%13.58%48.71%-35.12%17.36%68.98%18.46%
ECAR.L
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		61.55%15.47%0.80%20.74%-18.63%17.26%29.76%3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between INTL.L and ECAR.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019

0.75

The correlation between INTL.L and ECAR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
INTL.L
ECAR.L

Technology

79.3%
66.1%

Communication Services

8.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
28.6%

Healthcare

2.4%

-

Industrials

2.4%
4.8%

Financial Services

0.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.2%

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

INTL.L
79.3%
ECAR.L
66.1%

Communication Services

INTL.L
8.6%
ECAR.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

INTL.L
5.6%
ECAR.L
28.6%

Healthcare

INTL.L
2.4%
ECAR.L

-

Industrials

INTL.L
2.4%
ECAR.L
4.8%

Financial Services

INTL.L
0.9%
ECAR.L

-

Consumer Defensive

INTL.L
0.8%
ECAR.L

-

Basic Materials

INTL.L

-

ECAR.L
0.2%

Energy

INTL.L

-

ECAR.L

-

Real Estate

INTL.L

-

ECAR.L

-

Utilities

INTL.L

-

ECAR.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc

iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with INTL.L:
INTL.L vs. AIAI.LINTL.L vs. RBTX.LINTL.L vs. SMGB.LINTL.L vs. THNQINTL.L vs. EQGB.LINTL.L vs. IITU.LINTL.L vs. HNSS.L
Often compared with ECAR.L:
ECAR.L vs. IEVD.DEECAR.L vs. JPSC.DEECAR.L vs. DRVE.LECAR.L vs. LITECAR.L vs. SPYECAR.L vs. VGTECAR.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
ECAR.L
ECAR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

INTL.LECAR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.85
3.99

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.47
5.04

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.62

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.37

7.96

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.68

24.25

-4.57

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is comparable to the ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTL.L and ECAR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

INTL.LECAR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85

3.99

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.62

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.66

+0.29

Drawdowns

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTL.L drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, roughly equal to the maximum ECAR.L drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL.L and ECAR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

INTL.LECAR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.71%

-35.94%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-12.38%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.54%

-28.42%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

-28.74%

-8.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.00%

-8.68%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

4.07%

+0.83%

Volatility

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) is 9.73%, while iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a volatility of 11.93%. This indicates that INTL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

INTL.LECAR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.73%

11.93%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.45%

20.17%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.03%

24.75%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.61%

22.87%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.29%

23.91%

+2.38%

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both INTL.L and ECAR.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

Dividends

INTL.L vs. ECAR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTL.L nor ECAR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

INTL.L and ECAR.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INTL.L and ECAR.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTL.L and ECAR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer