PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTL.L vs. DHS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTL.L vs. DHS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTL.L achieves a 34.85% return, which is significantly higher than DHS.L's 12.15% return.


INTL.L

1D
-3.03%
1M
-8.62%
6M
28.33%
YTD
34.85%
1Y
56.41%
3Y*
25.07%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*

DHS.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.99%
6M
8.98%
YTD
12.15%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
9.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTL.L vs. DHS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc
34.85%14.50%13.58%48.71%-35.12%17.36%68.98%40.59%-27.33%
DHS.L
WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
12.15%4.77%20.38%-4.02%19.92%25.61%-7.64%18.85%-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between INTL.L and DHS.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018

0.36

The correlation between INTL.L and DHS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTL.L vs. DHS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS.L
DHS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DHS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTL.L vs. DHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INTL.LDHS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

3.58

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

12.31

-1.64

INTL.L vs. DHS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the DHS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTL.L and DHS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTL.L vs. DHS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTL.L drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, roughly equal to the maximum DHS.L drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL.L and DHS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTL.LDHS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.71%

-38.98%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-6.40%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.54%

-17.50%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

-18.39%

-18.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.39%

-1.32%

-9.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-9.19%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

1.86%

+3.41%

Volatility

INTL.L vs. DHS.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a higher volatility of 12.44% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) at 2.57%. This indicates that INTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTL.LDHS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.44%

2.57%

+9.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.12%

8.13%

+14.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.70%

10.53%

+18.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.48%

13.84%

+15.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.44%

14.89%

+14.55%

INTL.L vs. DHS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTL.L vs. DHS.L - Dividend Comparison

INTL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DHS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS.L
WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.63%2.89%5.19%5.19%2.83%2.87%5.63%4.86%3.06%2.70%2.51%2.46%
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INTL.L and DHS.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DHS.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DHS.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INTL.L.

INTL.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while DHS.L is Dividend. INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while DHS.L tracks WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for INTL.L and 0.29% for DHS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTL.L and DHS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer