PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTC vs. WBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INTC vs. WBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intel Corporation (INTC) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


INTC

1D
6.51%
1M
14.53%
YTD
237.59%
6M
229.46%
1Y
518.52%
3Y*
55.34%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
17.03%

WBA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTC vs. WBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTC
Intel Corporation
237.59%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%4.23%30.87%
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
0.00%28.40%-61.34%-25.09%-25.06%35.78%-29.38%-10.99%-3.65%-10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between INTC and WBA is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985

0.27

The correlation between INTC and WBA shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

INTC:

$53.76B

WBA:

$154.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INTC:

$19.05B

WBA:

$26.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

INTC:

$8.83B

WBA:

-$2.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTC vs. WBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

WBA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTC vs. WBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intel Corporation (INTC) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INTCWBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

48.84

INTC vs. WBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTC vs. WBA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTCWBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.30%

Volatility

INTC vs. WBA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTCWBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.20%

Dividends

INTC vs. WBA - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTC nor WBA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
0.00%0.00%10.72%7.35%5.13%3.62%4.64%3.04%2.46%2.13%1.78%1.64%

Financials

INTC vs. WBA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intel Corporation and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
13.58B
38.99B
(INTC) Total Revenue
(WBA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INTC and WBA have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTC and WBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer