INTC vs. MU
INTC (Intel Corporation) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, INTC returned 12.49%/yr vs 51.33%/yr for MU. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
INTC vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTC achieves a 144.44% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return. Over the past 10 years, INTC has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 12.49%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 51.33% annualized return.
INTC
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -28.99%
- 6M
- 94.10%
- YTD
- 144.44%
- 1Y
- 355.56%
- 3Y*
- 36.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.33%
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 655.32%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.93B | $11.73B | $14.62B | |
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B |
INTC vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTC Intel Corporation | 144.44% | 84.04% | -59.57% | 94.56% | -46.64% | 6.05% | -14.69% | 30.71% | 4.23% | 30.87% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTC and MU is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 1989 | 0.52 |
The correlation between INTC and MU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
INTC:
$454.97B
MU:
$929.52B
INTC:
-$2.31
MU:
$44.42
INTC:
7.74
MU:
10.36
INTC:
5.26
MU:
9.33
INTC:
$57.03B
MU:
$90.27B
INTC:
$22.02B
MU:
$65.51B
INTC:
$12.73B
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTC vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
INTC
MU
INTC vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intel Corporation (INTC) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTC | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.63 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.55 | 16.92 | -8.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.80 | 64.08 | -36.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTC vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTC drawdown since its inception was -82.25%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTC and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTC | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.25% | -98.25% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.90% | -39.10% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.80% | -57.63% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.04% | -57.63% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.80% | -57.63% | -13.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.00% | -32.17% | -3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | -58.02% | +21.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.87% | 10.31% | +2.56% |
Volatility
INTC vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Intel Corporation (INTC) is 23.88%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.11%. This indicates that INTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTC | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.88% | 31.11% | -7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.36% | 67.64% | -8.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.77% | 81.13% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.05% | 56.32% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.24% | 51.42% | -6.18% |
Dividends
INTC vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTC Intel Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.87% | 1.47% | 5.52% | 2.70% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 2.56% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.79% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
INTC vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intel Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INTC vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
INTC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intel Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.51B and revenue of 16.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.4%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
INTC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intel Corporation reported an operating income of 1.80B and revenue of 16.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
INTC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intel Corporation reported a net income of -11.03B and revenue of 16.13B, resulting in a net margin of -68.4%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTC and MU have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to INTC (23.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTC dropped -82.25% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 4.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTC and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer