PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTC vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INTC vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intel Corporation (INTC) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTC achieves a 198.83% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, INTC has outperformed IBM with an annualized return of 15.65%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.34% annualized return.


INTC

1D
11.19%
1M
-11.73%
YTD
198.83%
6M
173.62%
1Y
449.70%
3Y*
53.12%
5Y*
16.15%
10Y*
15.65%

IBM

1D
-1.41%
1M
22.22%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-7.98%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
31.74%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTC vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTC
Intel Corporation
198.83%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%4.23%30.87%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
-3.95%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between INTC and IBM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 1980

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between INTC and IBM has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INTC:

$560.50B

IBM:

$267.37B

EPS

INTC:

-$0.67

IBM:

$11.32

PS Ratio

INTC:

9.66

IBM:

3.87

PB Ratio

INTC:

5.03

IBM:

8.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

INTC:

$53.76B

IBM:

$68.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INTC:

$19.05B

IBM:

$40.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

INTC:

$8.83B

IBM:

$15.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTC vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTC vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intel Corporation (INTC) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTCIBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.07

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.76

0.23

+18.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.28

0.50

+43.78

INTC vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTC Sharpe Ratio is 6.16, which is higher than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTC and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTCIBMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.16

0.18

+5.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.70

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.43

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.29

+0.06

Drawdowns

INTC vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTC drawdown since its inception was -82.25%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTC and IBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTCIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.25%

-69.40%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.17%

-30.96%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.80%

-30.96%

-32.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.95%

-30.96%

-34.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.80%

-40.59%

-30.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.81%

-14.70%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.67%

-20.12%

-16.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.22%

14.23%

-4.01%

Volatility

INTC vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

Intel Corporation (INTC) has a higher volatility of 26.82% compared to International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) at 21.84%. This indicates that INTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTCIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.82%

21.84%

+4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.68%

34.54%

+23.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.75%

39.53%

+34.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.06%

27.15%

+24.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.07%

26.59%

+17.48%

Dividends

INTC vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.40%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%

Financials

INTC vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intel Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


12.00B14.00B16.00B18.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
13.58B
15.92B
(INTC) Total Revenue
(IBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INTC vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intel Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
39.4%
56.2%
Portfolio components
INTC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.35B and revenue of 13.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

IBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.

INTC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported an operating income of -3.14B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.1%.

IBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

INTC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a net income of -3.73B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in a net margin of -27.5%.

IBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INTC and IBM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTC has higher volatility (26.82%) compared to IBM (21.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTC dropped -82.25% vs IBM's -69.40%.

INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.16 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTC and IBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer