PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
INTC vs. 1810.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

INTC vs. 1810.HK

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

INTC (Intel Corporation) and 1810.HK (Xiaomi Corp) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — INTC in Semiconductors, 1810.HK in Consumer Electronics. Over the past 5 years, INTC returned 18.67%/yr vs -1.61%/yr for 1810.HK. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

INTC vs. 1810.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intel Corporation (INTC) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

INTC is traded in USD, while 1810.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1810.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTC achieves a 237.59% return, which is significantly higher than 1810.HK's -33.78% return.

INTC

1D
6.51%
1M
3.56%
YTD
237.59%
6M
229.46%
1Y
499.76%
3Y*
55.34%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
17.03%

1810.HK

1D
1.41%
1M
-17.66%
YTD
-33.78%
6M
-39.41%
1Y
-49.72%
3Y*
33.78%
5Y*
-1.61%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTC vs. 1810.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
INTC
Intel Corporation		237.59%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%-7.51%
1810.HK
Xiaomi Corp		-33.78%13.72%122.28%42.62%-42.22%-43.13%208.09%-16.13%-22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between INTC and 1810.HK is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2018

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Intel Corporation

Xiaomi Corp

Often compared with INTC:
INTC vs. AMDINTC vs. SPYINTC vs. AAPLINTC vs. CSCOINTC vs. QQQINTC vs. METAINTC vs. DELL
Often compared with 1810.HK:
1810.HK vs. 1211.HK1810.HK vs. 9988.HK1810.HK vs. 0992.HK1810.HK vs. 9961.HK1810.HK vs. 0005.HK1810.HK vs. BYD1810.HK vs. 0388.HK

Return for Risk

INTC vs. 1810.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
1810.HK
1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTC vs. 1810.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intel Corporation (INTC) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

INTC1810.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
6.84
-1.43

+8.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.30
-2.36

+7.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

0.74

+0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.85

-0.89

+21.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

48.84

-1.51

+50.35

INTC vs. 1810.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTC Sharpe Ratio is 6.84, which is higher than the 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio of -1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTC and 1810.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTC vs. 1810.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTC drawdown since its inception was -82.25%, which is greater than 1810.HK's maximum drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTC and 1810.HK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

INTC1810.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.25%

-76.36%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.17%

-56.97%

+32.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.80%

-56.97%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.95%

-70.98%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.80%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-56.36%

+52.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-42.10%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.30%

32.95%

-22.65%

Volatility

INTC vs. 1810.HK - Volatility Comparison

Intel Corporation (INTC) has a higher volatility of 24.56% compared to Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) at 8.98%. This indicates that INTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1810.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

INTC1810.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.56%

8.98%

+15.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.47%

26.23%

+32.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.69%

35.45%

+38.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.29%

44.22%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.20%

45.80%

-1.60%

Dividends

INTC vs. 1810.HK - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTC nor 1810.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1810.HK
Xiaomi Corp		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INTC
Intel Corporation		0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%

Financials

INTC vs. 1810.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intel Corporation and Xiaomi Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. INTC values in USD, 1810.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions

INTC and 1810.HK have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTC and 1810.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer