INSAX vs. MRFOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst Insider Buying Fund (INSAX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX).
INSAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Jul 29, 2011. MRFOX is managed by Marshfield. It was launched on Dec 29, 2015.
Performance
INSAX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INSAX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSAX Catalyst Insider Buying Fund | -12.22% | 15.39% | 23.86% | 31.44% | -32.65% | -17.65% | 14.36% | 23.91% | -2.91% | 17.03% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | -2.97% | 10.05% | 17.10% | 17.68% | 5.06% | 17.71% | 15.19% | 36.26% | 1.89% | 25.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INSAX achieves a -12.22% return, which is significantly lower than MRFOX's -2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, INSAX has underperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 4.66%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.31% annualized return.
INSAX
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- -12.22%
- 6M
- -16.64%
- 1Y
- 3.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
MRFOX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -2.97%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INSAX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INSAX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INSAX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank
INSAX
MRFOX
INSAX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Insider Buying Fund (INSAX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INSAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 0.33 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 0.57 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.07 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 0.68 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | 1.75 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INSAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 0.33 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.92 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 1.07 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.06 | -0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between INSAX and MRFOX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
INSAX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison
INSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSAX Catalyst Insider Buying Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | 1.67% | 1.62% | 4.59% | 0.46% | 0.35% | 6.78% | 2.68% | 1.39% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 0.60% |
Drawdowns
INSAX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INSAX drawdown since its inception was -59.24%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSAX and MRFOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INSAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.24% | -29.10% | -30.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.44% | -7.09% | -16.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.26% | -12.98% | -44.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.24% | -29.10% | -30.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.79% | -5.32% | -15.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -2.37% | -11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.63% | 2.77% | +5.86% |
Volatility
INSAX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst Insider Buying Fund (INSAX) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 3.04%. This indicates that INSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INSAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 3.04% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.06% | 7.08% | +15.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.42% | 11.83% | +17.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.83% | 12.04% | +17.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.01% | 14.29% | +11.72% |