INRL.L vs. HKOR.L
INRL.L (Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)) and HKOR.L (HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - INRL.L tracks the MSCI India NR USD while HKOR.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INRL.L returned 7.21%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for HKOR.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INRL.L charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HKOR.L.
Performance
INRL.L vs. HKOR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INRL.L achieves a -12.50% return, which is significantly lower than HKOR.L's 107.38% return. Over the past 10 years, INRL.L has underperformed HKOR.L with an annualized return of 7.21%, while HKOR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.97% annualized return.
INRL.L
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- -12.50%
- 6M
- -13.28%
- 1Y
- -12.78%
- 3Y*
- 1.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
HKOR.L
- 1D
- -4.88%
- 1M
- 12.39%
- YTD
- 107.38%
- 6M
- 120.33%
- 1Y
- 228.58%
- 3Y*
- 45.20%
- 5Y*
- 19.90%
- 10Y*
- 17.97%
INRL.L vs. HKOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRL.L Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) | -12.50% | -5.74% | 11.19% | 12.56% | 1.46% | 25.81% | 9.68% | 2.69% | -3.77% | 24.93% |
HKOR.L HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD | 107.38% | 86.42% | -21.81% | 13.46% | -19.95% | -7.35% | 40.21% | 7.12% | -16.48% | 32.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRL.L and HKOR.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2012 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between INRL.L and HKOR.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
INRL.L vs. HKOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Consumer Cyclical
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Industrials
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Energy
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Basic Materials
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Technology
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Consumer Defensive
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Healthcare
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Communication Services
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Utilities
INRL.L
HKOR.L
Real Estate
INRL.L
HKOR.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INRL.L vs. HKOR.L — Risk / Return Rank
INRL.L
HKOR.L
INRL.L vs. HKOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) and HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INRL.L | HKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.84 | -0.96 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 11.12 | -11.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 39.48 | -40.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INRL.L | HKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | 6.39 | -7.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.79 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.74 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
INRL.L vs. HKOR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRL.L drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, smaller than the maximum HKOR.L drawdown of -44.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRL.L and HKOR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRL.L | HKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.58% | -44.41% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.97% | -21.26% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.82% | -29.09% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | -40.86% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.58% | -44.41% | +6.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.57% | -5.40% | -18.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -15.72% | +7.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.97% | 6.00% | +2.97% |
Volatility
INRL.L vs. HKOR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) is 6.18%, while HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that INRL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INRL.L | HKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 17.73% | -11.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.74% | 32.16% | -19.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 37.01% | -21.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 25.32% | -9.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 24.24% | -4.48% |
INRL.L vs. HKOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRL.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HKOR.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
INRL.L vs. HKOR.L - Dividend Comparison
INRL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HKOR.L HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD | 0.35% | 0.69% | 1.51% | 1.11% | 0.71% | 0.59% | 0.02% | 0.29% | 0.53% | 0.11% | 0.13% | 0.57% |
INRL.L Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INRL.L and HKOR.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HKOR.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HKOR.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INRL.L.
INRL.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while HKOR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INRL.L and 0.50% for HKOR.L.
Find the right allocation for INRL.L and HKOR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer