INRA.AS vs. IWDA.AS
INRA.AS (iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and IWDA.AS (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - INRA.AS is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition, while IWDA.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INRA.AS returned 8.13%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for IWDA.AS. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INRA.AS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.AS.
Performance
INRA.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
INRA.AS is traded in USD, while IWDA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IWDA.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INRA.AS achieves a 38.49% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.AS's 9.81% return.
INRA.AS
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- YTD
- 38.49%
- 6M
- 36.79%
- 1Y
- 80.34%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWDA.AS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 25.92%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
INRA.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRA.AS iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 38.49% | 45.54% | -25.57% | -20.66% | -0.42% |
IWDA.AS iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.81% | 21.46% | 19.36% | 23.68% | -11.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRA.AS and IWDA.AS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2022 | 0.54 |
The correlation between INRA.AS and IWDA.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INRA.AS vs. IWDA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
INRA.AS
IWDA.AS
INRA.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INRA.AS | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.40 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.97 | 3.05 | +3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.66 | 13.17 | +8.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INRA.AS | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.13 | 2.22 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.68 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
INRA.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRA.AS drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than IWDA.AS's maximum drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRA.AS and IWDA.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRA.AS | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.31% | -34.11% | -20.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -8.39% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.81% | -17.83% | -25.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -0.49% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -4.64% | -24.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 1.95% | +1.72% |
Volatility
INRA.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) at 2.94%. This indicates that INRA.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INRA.AS | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.96% | 2.94% | +7.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | 8.59% | +10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.31% | 11.51% | +13.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 15.47% | +11.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 15.80% | +11.02% |
INRA.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRA.AS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.AS's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
INRA.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither INRA.AS nor IWDA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
INRA.AS and IWDA.AS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWDA.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWDA.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while IWDA.AS is Global Equities. INRA.AS tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Transition, while IWDA.AS tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for INRA.AS and 0.20% for IWDA.AS.
Find the right allocation for INRA.AS and IWDA.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer