INQQ vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

INQQ (India Internet & Ecommerce ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INQQ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. INQQ is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, INQQ returned 3.36%/yr vs 18.98%/yr for PIT. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

INQQ vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INQQ achieves a -13.94% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 25.62% return.

INQQ

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: -13.94%
• 6M: -15.10%
• 1Y: -18.83%
• 3Y*: 3.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PIT

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -11.78%
• YTD: 25.62%
• 6M: 23.58%
• 1Y: 39.64%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INQQ vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
INQQ India Internet & Ecommerce ETF	-13.94%	-7.05%	19.12%	31.45%	-2.29%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	25.62%	21.63%	6.77%	-4.54%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between INQQ and PIT is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022	0.01

The correlation between INQQ and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

INQQ vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INQQ

INQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
INQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
INQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
INQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
INQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
INQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 57
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INQQ vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INQQ	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.06	1.85	-2.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.49	2.40	-3.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.33	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	2.62	-3.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	10.88	-12.12

INQQ vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INQQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INQQ and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INQQ vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INQQ drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INQQ and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INQQ	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.53%	-15.19%	-25.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.41%	-15.19%	-15.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.45%	-15.19%	-17.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.27%	-15.19%	-9.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.15%	-4.08%	-13.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.24%	3.66%	+11.58%

Volatility

INQQ vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) at 4.72%. This indicates that INQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INQQ	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	4.72%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.10%	19.40%	-4.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.89%	21.66%	-3.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.98%	17.50%	+2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.98%	17.50%	+2.48%

INQQ vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

INQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

INQQ vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

INQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than PIT's 7.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
INQQ India Internet & Ecommerce ETF	2.59%	2.23%	1.18%	0.04%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.10%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INQQ and PIT in my portfolio?

INQQ and PIT have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INQQ or PIT?

INQQ has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to PIT (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INQQ dropped -40.53% vs PIT's -15.19%.

Which ETF is better, INQQ or PIT?

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 18.98% vs 3.36% for INQQ. On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INQQ or PIT?

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 18.98% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INQQ or PIT?

PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INQQ or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 2.59% for INQQ.

What is the main difference between INQQ and PIT?

INQQ is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: India and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for INQQ and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.