INQQ vs. NDIA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

INQQ (INQQ The India Internet ETF) and NDIA (Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF) are both India Equities funds. INQQ is passively managed, while NDIA is actively managed. Over the past year, INQQ returned -13.28% vs -4.87% for NDIA. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. INQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for NDIA.

Performance

INQQ vs. NDIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) and Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INQQ achieves a -9.24% return, which is significantly lower than NDIA's -7.78% return.

INQQ

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.78%
• 6M: -1.28%
• YTD: -9.24%
• 1Y: -13.28%
• 3Y*: 2.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.37%

NDIA

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: -4.20%
• YTD: -7.78%
• 1Y: -4.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
INQQ INQQ The India Internet ETF	$156.31K	$248.20K	$372.41K
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	$55.71K	$86.05K	$392.94K

INQQ vs. NDIA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
INQQ INQQ The India Internet ETF	-9.24%	-7.05%	19.12%	12.08%
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	-7.78%	5.04%	5.75%	12.76%

Correlation

The correlation between INQQ and NDIA is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023	0.74

The correlation between INQQ and NDIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

INQQ vs. NDIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INQQ	NDIA
Consumer Cyclical	35.9%	11.4%
Financial Services	30.2%	32.7%
Technology	10.5%	5.9%
Communication Services	9.6%	5.9%
Energy	7.5%	9.2%
Healthcare	4.7%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	6.2%
Basic Materials	-	7.8%
Industrials	-	10.9%
Real Estate	-	2.8%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

INQQ vs. NDIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INQQ

INQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4
INQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
INQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
INQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
INQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
INQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

NDIA

NDIA Risk / Return Rank: 7
NDIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NDIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NDIA Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NDIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NDIA Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INQQ vs. NDIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) and Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INQQ	NDIA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	-0.30	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.98	-0.32	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	0.96	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	-0.28	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	-0.65	-0.17

INQQ vs. NDIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the NDIA Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INQQ and NDIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INQQ vs. NDIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INQQ drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than NDIA's maximum drawdown of -22.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INQQ and NDIA.

Drawdown Indicators

	INQQ	NDIA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.53%	-22.05%	-18.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.07%	-17.09%	-12.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.13%	-14.49%	-5.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.28%	-7.54%	-9.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.21%	7.46%	+8.75%

Volatility

INQQ vs. NDIA - Volatility Comparison

INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) at 4.57%. This indicates that INQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INQQ	NDIA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.80%	4.57%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.41%	14.08%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.23%	16.27%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.94%	15.61%	+4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.94%	15.61%	+4.33%

INQQ vs. NDIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

INQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than NDIA's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

INQQ vs. NDIA - Dividend Comparison

INQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than NDIA's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
INQQ INQQ The India Internet ETF	2.46%	2.23%	1.18%	0.04%
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	1.19%	1.10%	3.66%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INQQ and NDIA in my portfolio?

INQQ and NDIA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INQQ or NDIA?

INQQ has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to NDIA (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INQQ dropped -40.53% vs NDIA's -22.05%.

Which ETF is better, INQQ or NDIA?

On 1-year performance, NDIA leads with -4.87% vs -13.28% for INQQ. On fees, NDIA is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, NDIA has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INQQ or NDIA?

Over the 1-year period, NDIA has performed better with a -4.87% return vs -13.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INQQ or NDIA?

NDIA is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INQQ or NDIA?

INQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 1.19% for NDIA.

What is the main difference between INQQ and NDIA?

They also come from different issuers: EMQQ Global and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for INQQ and 0.76% for NDIA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NDIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.