PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INQQ vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INQQ vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INQQ achieves a -13.94% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.43% return.


INQQ

1D
-1.65%
1M
3.88%
YTD
-13.94%
6M
-15.10%
1Y
-18.83%
3Y*
3.36%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INQQ vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
INQQ
India Internet & Ecommerce ETF
-13.94%-7.05%19.12%7.22%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.43%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between INQQ and IBIC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.01

The correlation between INQQ and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INQQ vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INQQ
INQQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
INQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
INQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
INQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INQQ vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INQQIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-10.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

2.22

-1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

16.56

-17.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

58.67

-59.91

INQQ vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INQQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INQQ and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INQQ vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INQQ drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INQQ and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INQQIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.53%

-0.90%

-39.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.41%

-0.27%

-30.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.27%

-0.08%

-24.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.15%

-0.10%

-17.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.24%

0.08%

+15.16%

Volatility

INQQ vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that INQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INQQIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

0.17%

+5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.10%

0.67%

+14.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

0.89%

+17.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.98%

1.56%

+18.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

1.56%

+18.42%

INQQ vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

INQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

INQQ vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

INQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.58%4.43%4.65%0.83%
INQQ
India Internet & Ecommerce ETF
2.59%2.23%1.18%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


INQQ and IBIC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INQQ has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INQQ dropped -40.53% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.42% vs -18.83% for INQQ. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.42% return vs -18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 2.59% for INQQ.

INQQ is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. INQQ tracks INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: India and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for INQQ and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INQQ and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer