INQQ vs. FPA
INQQ (INQQ The India Internet ETF) and FPA (First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - INQQ is a India Equities fund tracking the INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FPA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INQQ returned 2.99%/yr vs 20.19%/yr for FPA. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FPA.
Performance
INQQ vs. FPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INQQ achieves a -9.24% return, which is significantly lower than FPA's 20.38% return.
INQQ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- -9.24%
- 1Y
- -13.28%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.37%
FPA
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -12.59%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 20.38%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $239.16K | $447.30K | $694.81K | |
| $156.31K | $248.20K | $372.41K |
INQQ vs. FPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INQQ INQQ The India Internet ETF | -9.24% | -7.05% | 19.12% | 31.45% | -34.72% |
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 20.38% | 43.16% | 3.95% | 9.97% | -16.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between INQQ and FPA is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022 | 0.32 |
The correlation between INQQ and FPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INQQ vs. FPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INQQ
FPA
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
INQQ
FPA
Financial Services
INQQ
FPA
Technology
INQQ
FPA
Communication Services
INQQ
FPA
Energy
INQQ
FPA
Healthcare
INQQ
FPA
Consumer Defensive
INQQ
FPA
Basic Materials
INQQ
-
FPA
Industrials
INQQ
-
FPA
Real Estate
INQQ
-
FPA
Utilities
INQQ
-
FPA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INQQ vs. FPA — Risk / Return Rank
INQQ
FPA
INQQ vs. FPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INQQ | FPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.20 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 1.18 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 4.12 | -4.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INQQ vs. FPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INQQ drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, smaller than the maximum FPA drawdown of -52.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INQQ and FPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INQQ | FPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.53% | -52.91% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.07% | -25.40% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.45% | -25.40% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.13% | -23.80% | +3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -13.48% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.21% | 7.28% | +8.93% |
Volatility
INQQ vs. FPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) is 5.80%, while First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that INQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INQQ | FPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 10.93% | -5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.41% | 28.24% | -12.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.23% | 30.44% | -12.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 25.27% | -5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 22.98% | -3.04% |
INQQ vs. FPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
INQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FPA's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
INQQ vs. FPA - Dividend Comparison
INQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than FPA's 4.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 4.03% | 4.71% | 3.40% | 3.02% | 4.22% | 5.12% | 1.59% | 3.90% | 2.81% | 3.15% | 2.42% | 1.74% |
INQQ INQQ The India Internet ETF | 2.46% | 2.23% | 1.18% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INQQ and FPA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPA has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to INQQ (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INQQ dropped -40.53% vs FPA's -52.91%.
On 3-year performance, FPA leads with 20.19% vs 2.99% for INQQ. On fees, FPA is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, INQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FPA has performed better with a 20.19% return vs 2.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FPA is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.
FPA has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 2.46% for INQQ.
INQQ is categorized as India Equities, while FPA is Asia Pacific Equities. INQQ tracks INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FPA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: EMQQ Global and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for INQQ and 0.80% for FPA.
FPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INQQ and FPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer