PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INQQ vs. FPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INQQ vs. FPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INQQ achieves a -9.24% return, which is significantly lower than FPA's 20.38% return.


INQQ

1D
0.71%
1M
1.78%
6M
-1.28%
YTD
-9.24%
1Y
-13.28%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.37%

FPA

1D
-1.70%
1M
-12.59%
6M
3.07%
YTD
20.38%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
7.79%
ALL TIME*
5.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$239.16K$447.30K$694.81K
$156.31K$248.20K$372.41K

INQQ vs. FPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
INQQ
INQQ The India Internet ETF
-9.24%-7.05%19.12%31.45%-34.72%
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
20.38%43.16%3.95%9.97%-16.22%

Correlation

The correlation between INQQ and FPA is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022

0.32

The correlation between INQQ and FPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INQQ vs. FPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INQQ
FPA

Consumer Cyclical

35.9%
7.5%

Financial Services

30.2%
8.8%

Technology

10.5%
27.9%

Communication Services

9.6%
2.6%

Energy

7.5%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.7%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Industrials

-

32.9%

Real Estate

-

6.2%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

INQQ
35.9%
FPA
7.5%

Financial Services

INQQ
30.2%
FPA
8.8%

Technology

INQQ
10.5%
FPA
27.9%

Communication Services

INQQ
9.6%
FPA
2.6%

Energy

INQQ
7.5%
FPA
4.9%

Healthcare

INQQ
4.7%
FPA
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

INQQ
1.6%
FPA
2.8%

Basic Materials

INQQ

-

FPA
3.7%

Industrials

INQQ

-

FPA
32.9%

Real Estate

INQQ

-

FPA
6.2%

Utilities

INQQ

-

FPA
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INQQ vs. FPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INQQ
INQQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
INQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
INQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
INQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FPA
FPA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INQQ vs. FPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INQQFPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.20

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

1.18

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.82

4.12

-4.94

INQQ vs. FPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the FPA Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INQQ and FPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INQQ vs. FPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INQQ drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, smaller than the maximum FPA drawdown of -52.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INQQ and FPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INQQFPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.53%

-52.91%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.07%

-25.40%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.45%

-25.40%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.13%

-23.80%

+3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.28%

-13.48%

-3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.21%

7.28%

+8.93%

Volatility

INQQ vs. FPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) is 5.80%, while First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that INQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INQQFPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

10.93%

-5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.41%

28.24%

-12.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.23%

30.44%

-12.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

25.27%

-5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

22.98%

-3.04%

INQQ vs. FPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

INQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FPA's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

INQQ vs. FPA - Dividend Comparison

INQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than FPA's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
4.03%4.71%3.40%3.02%4.22%5.12%1.59%3.90%2.81%3.15%2.42%1.74%
INQQ
INQQ The India Internet ETF
2.46%2.23%1.18%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INQQ and FPA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPA has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to INQQ (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INQQ dropped -40.53% vs FPA's -52.91%.

On 3-year performance, FPA leads with 20.19% vs 2.99% for INQQ. On fees, FPA is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, INQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FPA has performed better with a 20.19% return vs 2.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPA is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.

FPA has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 2.46% for INQQ.

INQQ is categorized as India Equities, while FPA is Asia Pacific Equities. INQQ tracks INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FPA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: EMQQ Global and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for INQQ and 0.80% for FPA.

FPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INQQ and FPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer