INQQ vs. EMMF

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

INQQ (India Internet & Ecommerce ETF) and EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - INQQ is a India Equities fund tracking the INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while EMMF is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. INQQ is passively managed, while EMMF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, INQQ returned 3.12%/yr vs 18.42%/yr for EMMF. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EMMF.

Performance

INQQ vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INQQ achieves a -10.94% return, which is significantly lower than EMMF's 17.46% return.

INQQ

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 7.90%
• 6M: -8.61%
• YTD: -10.94%
• 1Y: -18.33%
• 3Y*: 3.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMMF

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: -4.94%
• 6M: 11.15%
• YTD: 17.46%
• 1Y: 30.83%
• 3Y*: 18.42%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INQQ vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
INQQ India Internet & Ecommerce ETF	-10.94%	-7.05%	19.12%	31.45%	-34.72%
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	17.46%	21.22%	9.45%	20.59%	-8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between INQQ and EMMF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022	0.47

The correlation between INQQ and EMMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INQQ vs. EMMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INQQ	EMMF
Financial Services	35.3%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	26.9%	13.6%
Technology	11.6%	32.9%
Communication Services	9.2%	6.6%
Energy	7.8%	2.1%
Healthcare	6.7%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	4.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.9%
Industrials	-	3.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

INQQ vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INQQ

INQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
INQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
INQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
INQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
INQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
INQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EMMF

EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 63
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INQQ vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INQQ	EMMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.03	1.55	-2.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.44	2.04	-3.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.31	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.61	2.92	-3.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	9.60	-10.77

INQQ vs. EMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INQQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the EMMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INQQ and EMMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INQQ vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INQQ drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than EMMF's maximum drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INQQ and EMMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	INQQ	EMMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.53%	-32.57%	-7.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.20%	-10.62%	-19.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.45%	-16.02%	-16.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.63%	-9.35%	-12.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.22%	-7.43%	-9.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.71%	3.22%	+12.49%

Volatility

INQQ vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) is 5.31%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that INQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INQQ	EMMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	9.96%	-4.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.23%	18.51%	-3.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.94%	20.03%	-2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.94%	15.24%	+4.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.94%	17.03%	+2.91%

INQQ vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

INQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

INQQ vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison

INQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than EMMF's 2.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	2.01%	2.45%	1.30%	1.62%	3.48%	2.64%	1.93%	2.93%	0.66%
INQQ India Internet & Ecommerce ETF	2.50%	2.23%	1.18%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INQQ and EMMF in my portfolio?

INQQ and EMMF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INQQ or EMMF?

EMMF has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to INQQ (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INQQ dropped -40.53% vs EMMF's -32.57%.

Which ETF is better, INQQ or EMMF?

On 3-year performance, EMMF leads with 18.42% vs 3.12% for INQQ. On fees, EMMF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, INQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INQQ or EMMF?

Over the 3-year period, EMMF has performed better with a 18.42% return vs 3.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INQQ or EMMF?

EMMF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INQQ or EMMF?

INQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 2.01% for EMMF.

What is the main difference between INQQ and EMMF?

INQQ is categorized as India Equities, while EMMF is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: India and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for INQQ and 0.48% for EMMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.