INQQ vs. EMMF
INQQ (India Internet & Ecommerce ETF) and EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. INQQ is passively managed, while EMMF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, INQQ returned 3.41%/yr vs 24.40%/yr for EMMF. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EMMF.
Performance
INQQ vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INQQ achieves a -17.05% return, which is significantly lower than EMMF's 29.25% return.
INQQ
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- -17.05%
- 6M
- -19.37%
- 1Y
- -22.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMMF
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 29.25%
- 6M
- 30.61%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- —
INQQ vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INQQ India Internet & Ecommerce ETF | -17.05% | -7.05% | 19.12% | 31.45% | -34.73% |
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 29.25% | 21.22% | 9.45% | 20.59% | -8.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between INQQ and EMMF is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022 | 0.48 |
INQQ vs. EMMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INQQ
EMMF
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
INQQ
EMMF
Consumer Cyclical
INQQ
EMMF
Technology
INQQ
EMMF
Communication Services
INQQ
EMMF
Energy
INQQ
EMMF
Healthcare
INQQ
EMMF
Consumer Defensive
INQQ
EMMF
Basic Materials
INQQ
-
EMMF
Industrials
INQQ
-
EMMF
Real Estate
INQQ
-
EMMF
-
Utilities
INQQ
-
EMMF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INQQ vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank
INQQ
EMMF
INQQ vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INQQ | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | 3.08 | -4.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | 4.02 | -5.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.59 | -0.80 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 4.79 | -5.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.57 | 19.83 | -21.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INQQ | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.28 | 3.08 | -4.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | 0.55 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
INQQ vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INQQ drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than EMMF's maximum drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INQQ and EMMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INQQ | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.53% | -32.57% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.41% | -10.62% | -19.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.45% | -16.02% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.01% | -0.25% | -26.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.04% | -7.45% | -9.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.10% | 2.57% | +11.53% |
Volatility
INQQ vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) is 5.59%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that INQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INQQ | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 7.08% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.48% | 14.42% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 16.53% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.95% | 14.38% | +5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.95% | 16.62% | +3.33% |
INQQ vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
INQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
INQQ vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison
INQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than EMMF's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 1.83% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% |
INQQ India Internet & Ecommerce ETF | 2.69% | 2.23% | 1.18% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INQQ and EMMF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMMF has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to INQQ (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INQQ dropped -40.53% vs EMMF's -32.57%.
On 3-year performance, EMMF leads with 24.40% vs 3.41% for INQQ. On fees, EMMF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, INQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMMF has performed better with a 24.40% return vs 3.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMMF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.
INQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.83% for EMMF.
They also come from different issuers: India and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for INQQ and 0.48% for EMMF.
EMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INQQ and EMMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer