PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INOV vs. OCTJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INOV vs. OCTJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October (OCTJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INOV achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly higher than OCTJ's 2.30% return.


INOV

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.31%
YTD
5.40%
6M
7.23%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTJ

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.30%
6M
3.00%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INOV vs. OCTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between INOV and OCTJ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.42

INOV vs. OCTJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INOV
OCTJ

Financial Services

24.7%
12.4%

Industrials

19.8%
8.5%

Healthcare

10.6%
9.5%

Technology

10.3%
33.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
5.3%

Basic Materials

5.9%
1.9%

Communication Services

4.5%
10.5%

Energy

4.0%
4.0%

Utilities

4.0%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Financial Services

INOV
24.7%
OCTJ
12.4%

Industrials

INOV
19.8%
OCTJ
8.5%

Healthcare

INOV
10.6%
OCTJ
9.5%

Technology

INOV
10.3%
OCTJ
33.6%

Consumer Cyclical

INOV
7.7%
OCTJ
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

INOV
6.7%
OCTJ
5.3%

Basic Materials

INOV
5.9%
OCTJ
1.9%

Communication Services

INOV
4.5%
OCTJ
10.5%

Energy

INOV
4.0%
OCTJ
4.0%

Utilities

INOV
4.0%
OCTJ
2.5%

Real Estate

INOV
1.9%
OCTJ
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INOV vs. OCTJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INOV
INOV Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
INOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
INOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
INOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTJ
OCTJ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
OCTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INOV vs. OCTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October (OCTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INOVOCTJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.48

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

4.65

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

23.63

-15.55

INOV vs. OCTJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the OCTJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INOV and OCTJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INOVOCTJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.21

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.82

1.47

+0.35

Drawdowns

INOV vs. OCTJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INOV drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, which is greater than OCTJ's maximum drawdown of -5.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INOV and OCTJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INOVOCTJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-5.35%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-1.25%

-5.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.00%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-0.16%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

0.24%

+1.56%

Volatility

INOV vs. OCTJ - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October (OCTJ) at 0.52%. This indicates that INOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCTJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INOVOCTJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

0.52%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

1.95%

+5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.69%

2.62%

+6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

4.22%

+4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.56%

4.22%

+4.34%

INOV vs. OCTJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

INOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTJ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

INOV vs. OCTJ - Dividend Comparison

INOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OCTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INOV and OCTJ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INOV has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to OCTJ (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INOV dropped -8.01% vs OCTJ's -5.35%.

On 1-year performance, INOV leads with 14.54% vs 5.77% for OCTJ. On fees, OCTJ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, OCTJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INOV has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OCTJ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INOV.

OCTJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 0.00% for INOV.

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INOV and 0.79% for OCTJ.

OCTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INOV and OCTJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer