PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INN1.DE vs. XMEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INN1.DE vs. XMEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in ING Groep NV (INN1.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

INN1.DE is traded in EUR, while XMEU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMEU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INN1.DE achieves a 13.28% return, which is significantly higher than XMEU.L's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, INN1.DE has outperformed XMEU.L with an annualized return of 16.55%, while XMEU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.12% annualized return.


INN1.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
8.10%
YTD
13.28%
6M
20.12%
1Y
49.92%
3Y*
39.77%
5Y*
27.48%
10Y*
16.55%

XMEU.L

1D
0.45%
1M
3.25%
YTD
7.76%
6M
9.91%
1Y
15.96%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
9.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INN1.DE vs. XMEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INN1.DE
ING Groep NV
13.28%71.33%19.67%26.46%1.99%67.01%-22.49%22.77%-36.23%21.28%
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C
7.76%19.25%8.60%15.66%-8.46%24.44%-3.11%27.05%-10.57%10.30%

Correlation

The correlation between INN1.DE and XMEU.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2007

0.48

The correlation between INN1.DE and XMEU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INN1.DE vs. XMEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INN1.DE
INN1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
INN1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INN1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
INN1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
INN1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
INN1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XMEU.L
XMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INN1.DE vs. XMEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ING Groep NV (INN1.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INN1.DEXMEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.70

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

6.32

+3.09

INN1.DE vs. XMEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INN1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INN1.DE and XMEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INN1.DEXMEU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.29

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.70

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.58

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.33

-0.19

Drawdowns

INN1.DE vs. XMEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INN1.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.10%, which is greater than XMEU.L's maximum drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INN1.DE and XMEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INN1.DEXMEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.10%

-56.53%

-35.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.89%

-9.36%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.96%

-16.13%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.20%

-19.33%

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.40%

-35.92%

-35.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-0.58%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.64%

-8.91%

-29.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

2.52%

+2.77%

Volatility

INN1.DE vs. XMEU.L - Volatility Comparison

ING Groep NV (INN1.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) at 3.92%. This indicates that INN1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INN1.DEXMEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

3.92%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.00%

10.02%

+8.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.84%

12.35%

+11.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.07%

14.22%

+13.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.49%

15.61%

+16.88%

Dividends

INN1.DE vs. XMEU.L - Dividend Comparison

INN1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, while XMEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INN1.DE
ING Groep NV
4.78%5.07%7.34%6.06%7.09%4.88%5.05%6.30%7.15%4.28%4.89%2.85%
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INN1.DE and XMEU.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INN1.DE and XMEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer