PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INMU vs. PMMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INMU vs. PMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INMU achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than PMMF's 1.52% return.


INMU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.98%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*

PMMF

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.82%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INMU vs. PMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between INMU and PMMF is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INMU vs. PMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INMU
INMU Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
INMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
INMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
INMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
INMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PMMF
PMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INMU vs. PMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INMUPMMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-91.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

38.37

-36.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

161.17

-158.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

1,488.23

-1,478.70

INMU vs. PMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is lower than the PMMF Sharpe Ratio of 19.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INMU and PMMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INMUPMMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

19.72

-16.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

11.97

-11.38

Drawdowns

INMU vs. PMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INMU drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, which is greater than PMMF's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INMU and PMMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INMUPMMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-0.13%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.58%

-0.02%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

0.00%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-0.00%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.00%

+0.75%

Volatility

INMU vs. PMMF - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) at 0.05%. This indicates that INMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INMUPMMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.05%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

0.12%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51%

0.20%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.60%

0.34%

+3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.54%

0.34%

+3.20%

INMU vs. PMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

INMU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PMMF's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

INMU vs. PMMF - Dividend Comparison

INMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than PMMF's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
INMU
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF
3.36%3.48%3.47%3.44%1.92%1.14%
PMMF
iShares Prime Money Market ETF
3.83%3.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INMU and PMMF have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INMU has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to PMMF (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INMU dropped -10.67% vs PMMF's -0.13%.

On 1-year performance, INMU leads with 7.17% vs 4.00% for PMMF. On fees, PMMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PMMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INMU has performed better with a 7.17% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PMMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INMU.

PMMF has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 3.36% for INMU.

INMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PMMF is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INMU and 0.20% for PMMF.

PMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.72 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INMU and PMMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer