INMU vs. GSG
INMU (BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - INMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BlackRock, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. INMU is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INMU returned 1.78%/yr vs 15.74%/yr for GSG. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. INMU charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
INMU vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INMU achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.
INMU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 42.58%
- 6M
- 41.06%
- 1Y
- 51.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 15.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
INMU vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INMU BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF | 1.73% | 5.52% | 2.77% | 6.50% | -7.78% | 2.84% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 42.58% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 23.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between INMU and GSG is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2021 | -0.04 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between INMU and GSG has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INMU vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
INMU
GSG
INMU vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INMU | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.40 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 5.47 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 14.39 | -4.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INMU | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.26 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.70 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | -0.09 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
INMU vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INMU drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INMU and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INMU | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -89.62% | +78.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -9.46% | +6.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.88% | -14.94% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.67% | -29.12% | +18.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -56.95% | +56.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -63.71% | +60.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 3.59% | -2.84% |
Volatility
INMU vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) is 0.81%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that INMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INMU | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 7.65% | -6.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.88% | 20.42% | -18.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51% | 22.95% | -20.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 22.61% | -19.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 22.03% | -18.49% |
INMU vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
INMU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
INMU vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
INMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INMU BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF | 3.36% | 3.48% | 3.47% | 3.44% | 1.92% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INMU and GSG have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to INMU (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INMU dropped -10.67% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 5-year performance, GSG leads with 15.74% vs 1.78% for INMU. On fees, INMU is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, INMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSG has performed better with a 15.74% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INMU is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
INMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
INMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INMU and 0.75% for GSG.
INMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INMU and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer