INIVX vs. FKUTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INIVX (VanEck International Investors Gold Fund) and FKUTX (Franklin Utilities Fund) are both mutual funds - INIVX is a Precious Metals fund managed by VanEck, while FKUTX is a Utilities Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, INIVX returned 15.45%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for FKUTX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INIVX charges 1.42%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for FKUTX.

Performance

INIVX vs. FKUTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INIVX achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly higher than FKUTX's 5.84% return. Over the past 10 years, INIVX has outperformed FKUTX with an annualized return of 15.45%, while FKUTX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.

INIVX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 7.71%
• 6M: 16.89%
• 1Y: 78.67%
• 3Y*: 48.46%
• 5Y*: 21.66%
• 10Y*: 15.45%

FKUTX

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -4.87%
• YTD: 5.84%
• 6M: 4.36%
• 1Y: 12.75%
• 3Y*: 15.73%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INIVX vs. FKUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INIVX VanEck International Investors Gold Fund	7.71%	165.88%	14.37%	9.67%	-13.77%	-14.23%	40.91%	38.15%	-16.01%	13.06%
FKUTX Franklin Utilities Fund	5.84%	14.59%	27.18%	-4.91%	1.67%	18.00%	-1.87%	27.28%	2.54%	9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between INIVX and FKUTX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1980	0.14

The correlation between INIVX and FKUTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

INIVX vs. FKUTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INIVX

INIVX Risk / Return Rank: 36
INIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
INIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
INIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
INIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
INIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FKUTX

FKUTX Risk / Return Rank: 14
FKUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FKUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FKUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FKUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FKUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INIVX vs. FKUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INIVX	FKUTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	0.94	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	1.33	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.17	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	1.61	+1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.36	4.16	+3.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INIVX vs. FKUTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INIVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the FKUTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INIVX and FKUTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INIVX	FKUTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	0.94	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.63	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.51	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.61	-0.34

Drawdowns

INIVX vs. FKUTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INIVX drawdown since its inception was -78.96%, which is greater than FKUTX's maximum drawdown of -43.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INIVX and FKUTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	INIVX	FKUTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.96%	-43.59%	-35.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.60%	-8.10%	-21.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.60%	-16.35%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.66%	-22.53%	-22.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.20%	-36.56%	-14.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.95%	-6.46%	-14.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.77%	-7.00%	-30.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.62%	3.13%	+7.49%

Volatility

INIVX vs. FKUTX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) at 5.30%. This indicates that INIVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INIVX	FKUTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.11%	5.30%	+8.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.74%	11.31%	+26.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.95%	13.92%	+31.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.18%	16.91%	+17.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.99%	18.83%	+15.16%

INIVX vs. FKUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INIVX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FKUTX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

INIVX vs. FKUTX - Dividend Comparison

INIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, less than FKUTX's 7.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKUTX Franklin Utilities Fund	7.79%	7.70%	8.66%	6.47%	3.73%	4.96%	9.88%	4.29%	5.83%	3.55%	2.76%	6.14%
INIVX VanEck International Investors Gold Fund	5.58%	6.01%	7.45%	0.10%	0.00%	6.40%	11.70%	3.66%	2.87%	3.76%	6.40%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INIVX and FKUTX in my portfolio?

INIVX and FKUTX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INIVX or FKUTX?

INIVX has higher volatility (14.11%) compared to FKUTX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INIVX dropped -78.96% vs FKUTX's -43.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.