INFR vs. VOLT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. INFR is passively managed, while VOLT is actively managed. Over the past year, INFR returned 7.63% vs 67.05% for VOLT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.

Performance

INFR vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFR achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 37.53% return.

INFR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 7.63%
• 3Y*: 5.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOLT

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -3.31%
• YTD: 37.53%
• 6M: 33.91%
• 1Y: 67.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFR vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	24.00%	-4.84%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	37.53%	25.92%	-8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between INFR and VOLT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024	0.27

INFR vs. VOLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INFR	VOLT
Utilities	68.5%	31.2%
Industrials	27.5%	48.1%
Real Estate	4.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	5.0%
Financial Services	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	11.0%

Return for Risk

INFR vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFR

INFR Risk / Return Rank: 27
INFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
INFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
INFR Omega Ratio Rank: 31
INFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
INFR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 91
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFR vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INFR	VOLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	3.31	-2.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	4.13	-2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.54	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	7.52	-6.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.88	20.89	-17.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INFR vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFR and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INFR	VOLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	3.31	-2.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	1.50	-1.04

Drawdowns

INFR vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFR drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFR and VOLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFR	VOLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.28%	-23.40%	+4.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.43%	-8.96%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-3.91%	+3.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	-5.17%	+0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	3.22%	-1.18%

Volatility

INFR vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) is 0.00%, while Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that INFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INFR	VOLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	7.71%	-7.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.73%	17.12%	-13.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.90%	20.36%	-11.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.25%	24.08%	-9.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.25%	24.08%	-9.83%

INFR vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFR vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

INFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than VOLT's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	2.49%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.33%	0.46%	0.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFR and VOLT in my portfolio?

INFR and VOLT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INFR or VOLT?

VOLT has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to INFR (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFR dropped -19.28% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

Which ETF is better, INFR or VOLT?

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 67.05% vs 7.63% for INFR. On fees, INFR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, INFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INFR or VOLT?

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 67.05% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INFR or VOLT?

INFR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INFR or VOLT?

INFR has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.33% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between INFR and VOLT?

They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.75% for VOLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.