INFR vs. TNGY
INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. INFR is passively managed, while TNGY is actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
INFR vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INFR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNGY
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 14.42%
- YTD
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 18.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFR vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.41% | 5.69% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 15.24% | -2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFR and TNGY is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFR vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
INFR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TNGY
INFR vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INFR | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.98 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFR vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFR | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.89% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.75% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility
INFR vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFR | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.30% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.47% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.47% | — |
INFR vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFR vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TNGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.71% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 4.61% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFR and TNGY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INFR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INFR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
TNGY has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 1.71% for INFR.
They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for INFR and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer