INFR vs. PBOG
INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the RARE Global Infrastructure Index, while PBOG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
INFR vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFR achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 32.22% return.
INFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 32.22%
- 6M
- 29.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFR vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.41% | 0.86% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 32.22% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFR and PBOG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFR vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
INFR
PBOG
INFR vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INFR | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INFR | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 3.31 | -2.85 |
Drawdowns
INFR vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFR drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -11.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFR and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFR | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -11.45% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -6.81% | +6.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -3.10% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | — | — |
Volatility
INFR vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFR | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.00% | 23.67% | -14.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 23.67% | -9.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 23.67% | -9.41% |
INFR vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFR vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
INFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than PBOG's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 2.49% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFR and PBOG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.
INFR has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.
INFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while PBOG is Oil & Gas. INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index, while PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for INFR and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer