PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INFR vs. MDST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INFR vs. MDST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


INFR

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MDST

1D
0.86%
1M
5.13%
6M
18.80%
YTD
19.41%
1Y
23.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFR vs. MDST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
INFR
ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF
1.41%24.00%-1.43%
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
19.41%7.09%17.03%

Correlation

The correlation between INFR and MDST is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024

0.24

The correlation between INFR and MDST shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INFR vs. MDST - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INFR
MDST

Utilities

68.5%

-

Industrials

27.5%
0.9%

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

97.3%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

INFR
68.5%
MDST

-

Industrials

INFR
27.5%
MDST
0.9%

Real Estate

INFR
4.1%
MDST

-

Basic Materials

INFR

-

MDST

-

Communication Services

INFR

-

MDST

-

Consumer Cyclical

INFR

-

MDST

-

Consumer Defensive

INFR

-

MDST

-

Energy

INFR

-

MDST
97.3%

Financial Services

INFR

-

MDST

-

Healthcare

INFR

-

MDST

-

Technology

INFR

-

MDST

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INFR vs. MDST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MDST
MDST Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MDST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDST Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MDST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDST Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFR vs. MDST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INFRMDSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.28

INFR vs. MDST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INFR vs. MDST - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INFRMDSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

Volatility

INFR vs. MDST - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INFRMDSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

INFR vs. MDST - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MDST's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

INFR vs. MDST - Dividend Comparison

INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%.


PositionTTM202520242023
INFR
ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF
1.71%2.52%2.36%3.06%
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
9.05%10.22%6.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INFR and MDST have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INFR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INFR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MDST.

MDST has the higher dividend yield at 9.05%, compared with 1.71% for INFR.

They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and Westwood. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.80% for MDST.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INFR and MDST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer